User talk:PennySeven

March 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 22:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PennySeven (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Tan told me on his talk page: "Get the fuck off my talk page" after I left a comment on his talk page after he insulted my use of the English language. Now he blocks me out of revenge. I ask to be unblocked. I do not think I should be blocked because I won´t keep quiet about his "Get the fuck off my talk page" statement. PennySeven (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not only am I declining this request, I've upped it to indefinite. Between your actions here and on your previous account, you've shown a complete inability to work within the community norms. If you can convince another admin in the future that you know what you've been doing wrong and that you won't do it in the future, they can reduce it from indef, but I'm not going to give you a point to aim for where you can start editing disruptively again. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WikiProject Economics census

Hello there. Sorry to bother you, but you are (titularly at least) a member of WP:WikiProject Economics, as defined by this category. If you don't know me, I'm a Wikipedia administrator, but an unqualified economist. I enjoy writing about economics, but I'm not very good at it, which is why I would like to support in any way I can the strong body of economists here on Wikipedia. I'm only bothering you because you are probably one of them. Together, I'd like us to establish the future direction of WikiProject Economics, but first, we need to know who we've got to help.

Whatever your area of expertise or level of qualification, if you're interested in helping with the WikiProject (even if only as part of a larger commitment to this wonderful online encyclopedia of ours), would you mind adding your signature to this page? It only takes a second. Thank you.

Message delivered on behalf of User:Jarry1250 by LivingBot.

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PennySeven for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. LK (talk) 04:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]