User talk:Pennsylvania Penguin

This user may have left Wikipedia. Pennsylvania Penguin has not edited Wikipedia since November 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello

Hello! You and I have written on similar topics (e.g., Calumet-Norvelt). I graduated from Latrobe. Please send me an email; it might be fun to talk about some of these things. My email address is on my user page. Canadian2006 (talk) 02:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hockey Project

Hey, I noticed you have been putting alot of work into the Penguins. Thought you might be interested in joining the Hockey Project. Take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey. -Djsasso (talk) 14:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Operation COOKIE MONSTER

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Million Dollar Backfield

On 13 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Million Dollar Backfield, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 06:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Harry March

Thanks for the good work on the Dr. Harry March article, I enjoyed reading your additions - Mike Moran —Preceding unsigned comment added by Revmoran (talk • contribs) 21:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More football coaches

Hello! I see you have an interest in College Football in Pennsylvania. Perhaps you can help me with some articles in my workspace--I have several Geneva College coaches that need some more sources. Please review here and feel free to be bold and make changes!--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:14, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

College football

Pennsylvania Penguin, hello. I've noticed some of your recent edits related to college football. Thanks for getting the article on John Moorehead (American football coach) started. Just wanted to touch base with you about Template:Infobox college coach. I've made some recent changes to improve the template and eliminate some of the ambiguity and in efficiency therein. First, the Player and Coach trigger fields are no longer needed. Also, please note that a few of the fields (Title, College, Conference, CurrentRecord, Contract) should only be populated for current coaches. On Otto Wagonhurst, for example, his playing career at Penn should be noted in the Years and Team field. College should be left blank. Thanks and let me know if you have any thoughts about the template. Jweiss11 (talk) 12:53, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanksgiving games pre-1920

Hey, thanks for adding the pre-1920 pro football section to the NFL on Thanksgiving Day article. I've added some of the New York ones to it and I think it makes a nice addition to illustrate the game's pre-NFL traditions. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 19:53, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Columbus Panhandles

Hello Pennsylvania Penguin. I have been working on the Columbus Panhandles article for about a week. I noticed you expanded the article quite greatly, but you never added any references to it. I am currently working on bringing the article up to GA standards, and I was wondering if you could help by putting in citations (I already have the ^{[citation needed]} tags located where references should go). If so, that would be a great help! Thanks and have a great day.
—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 07:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Thanks. Ever since I saw an article in my local paper about the Akron Pros, I'll been fascinated by the early era of pro football.
—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 23:24, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Football Articles

Penguin,

You're right; I should have never reverted your information, as it's very contributing to Wikipedia. There's not many users dedicated to editing old football articles on here. I had some real-life stuff going on, so that was the reason I did what I did. I should have went to your talk page about the page numbers thing. Thanks for being nice about the situation, and thanks for all the work you have done on the football articles. Hope to be working with you in the future!
—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 23:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Season renames

Be careful with renaming old seasons like that. A number of the older leagues from that time period only played in one year. I am not sure if that is the case with the ones WPHL ones I noticed you moving but you might want to check on that as the title would be incorrect if they did only play in one year. -DJSasso (talk) 13:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alain Lemieux

Based on your edit to Alain Lemieux, you might be interested in this: Valley Sports Complex--GrapedApe (talk) 04:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1903-06 Massillon Tigers / Bob Shiring

My great-grandfather, Bob Shiring, played center for the Massillon Tigers from 1903-06. He was from the Pittsburgh area and was one of four "ringers" paid to play by Massillon. He also played for the J.F. Lalus Athletic Club in Pittsburgh in 1899-1900, Homestead Library & Athletic Club in 1901, and Pittsburgh Stars/Pros in 1902. I have inherited a collection of original photos from these teams and and have collected other photos and articles. Sports Illustrated ran a story in the 2/6/12 issue called The First Super Bowl on the big game in 1906 between Canton and Massillon. I helped the writer with the story and SI gave me a photo credit for the picture postcard of the Canton team that I provided them for the article. I am working on some related projects and would enjoy connecting with anyone interested in sharing information, asking questions, etc. Please feel free to contact me at gkficery@comcast.net. Thanks! ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gficery (talk • contribs) 14:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work ...

on providing the better infobox for Horween. I hadn't thought about the military in the ibox. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox NFL player

Greetings, Pennsylvania Penguin.

Please do not convert instances of Template:Infobox NFL player to Infobox gridiron football person when used in the biographies of current or former NFL players. Infobox NFL player is the correct infobox template for all NFL players, past and present. Infobox gridiron football should only be used for past and present CFL players. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bankers colours

Hi. I'm interested to know if you've got a source at hand for the team colours of WPHL ice hockey club Pittsburgh Bankers?

Thanks.

Fairhop (talk) 20:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question, it was pretty much a guess - but one that is highly probable, based on science and history.

A buddy of mine has done work on colorizing black and white films. From his past experience, he believes that the colors of the "$" symbol on their uniforms for the 1908 team was green, while the uniform itself is most likely black. We can still be wrong but the odds are in favor. We are also looking to see if the team colors changed from year to year, which was common for the era.

However to help justify this fact, we will be reviewing a ton of newspaper game accounts of WPHL games from the Pittsburgh Press this coming winter. This ties into a few of our other early sports projects. Most accounts of the games from this era whether it be hockey, football, basketball or baseball usually refer to team by their team colors.

Thanks. --Pennsylvania Penguin (talk) 14:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've done a bit of research on that myself, through the Pittsburgh Press newspapers, that's why I asked the question. So far I've established that the Pittsburgh Lyceum played in Maroon and White, Pittsburgh Pirates in Blue and White, and the Pittsburgh Athletic Club in Crimson and White. It's all in this link below.

"Great hockey to be played in this city" The Pittsburgh Press, November 24, 1907.

This link says Pittsburgh Keystones played in Blue and White.

"Keystones to take a trip" The Pittsburgh Press, January 10, 1904.

Haven't found anything so far on the Bankers, Victorias and Duquesne.

The Duquesne team wore red and black. I know this because the Duquesne Country and Athletic Club was also one of the very first professional football teams, and was supported by the same club that supported the Pittsburgh Duquesne. If you read some of the links that are cited on the page from the Professional Football Researchers Association, the team was referred to as the red and blacks. So its 99.9% probable that the club's hockey team wore the same colors.--Pennsylvania Penguin (talk) 12:49, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gastonia Pirates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gulf Coast League Twins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rudy Hernandez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gulf Coast League Phillies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruben Amaro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Gergen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Gergen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Gergen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 05:43, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nathan Moon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Moon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Moon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 04:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johan Hedberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1997 World Ice Hockey Championships. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wren Blair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westmount Public School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dominican Summer League Pirates 2 roster

Template:Dominican Summer League Pirates 2 roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joeykai (talk) 04:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:1895 Latrobe team.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:1895 Latrobe team.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:33 RB msI 2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:33 RB msI 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:33 RB msI 2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:33 RB msI 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:33 RB msI 2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:33 RB msI 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pennsylvania Penguin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pittsburgh Phantoms (RHI)

Just had to hack and slash this article that looks like was mostly edited by you due to someone pointing out a copyright issue. Do you recall if the information was copied by you or if perhaps the blog copied the information from the wiki. Either way I removed the potentially offending material to prevent a deletion of the page but thought I would let you know so you could take a look. -DJSasso (talk) 18:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tradewater Park jpg.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Tradewater Park jpg.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2017 NHL Stadium Series

added a link pointing to KDKA

List of outdoor ice hockey games

added a link pointing to KDKA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Older Maxwell.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Older Maxwell.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pennsylvania Penguin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chronicle-Telegraph Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Howell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CasinoExterior585.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CasinoExterior585.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Using tables instead of infoboxes

I see that in this edit you added a table to an article that resembles an infobox where you could have used, say, {{infobox baseball team}}. Could you please explain your reasoning for why this was a better approach? Thanks, Bovlb (talk) 23:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Pottsville Eleven a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Pottsville Maroons. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 17:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give St. Mary's Cadets a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Dayton Triangles. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Talk:St. Mary's Cadets a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Talk:Dayton Triangles. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Talk:Pottsville Eleven a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Talk:Pottsville Maroons. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 18:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Racine Regulars a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Racine Legion. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 19:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Talk:Racine Regulars a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Talk:Racine Legion. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 19:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give All-Tonawanda All-Stars a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Tonawanda Kardex Lumbermen. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 19:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Stapleton Football Club a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Staten Island Stapletons. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 19:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Toledo Athletic Club a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Toledo Maroons. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 19:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Talk:Stapleton Football Club a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Talk:Staten Island Stapletons. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 23:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Talk:Toledo Athletic Club a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Talk:Toledo Maroons. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bsherr (talk) 23:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:AdamWyant.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AdamWyant.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. GMG ^talk 17:21, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pennsylvania Penguin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

William Kirscher

Hello, can you please look this over and see if you can help? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 07:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

William Kirschner

Hello, can you please look this over and see if you can help? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 07:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Massillon logo.jpg

The file File:Massillon logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:50, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Milwaukee Badgers coach navbox

Template:Milwaukee Badgers coach navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Poe Brothers.jpg

The file File:Poe Brothers.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Underwood

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jack Underwood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Paul W (talk) 15:13, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore this CSD - the original article had been vandalised, so I reverted to a more recent stable version. Paul W (talk) 18:47, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Leroymercer.jpg

The file File:Leroymercer.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bob torrey.jpg

The file File:Bob torrey.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Trenchard mayo card.jpg

The file File:Trenchard mayo card.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Syracuse Pros players for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Syracuse Pros players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Syracuse Pros players until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:47, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Tonawanda Kardex.gif

The file File:Tonawanda Kardex.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopedic, no legitimate educational usage, no evidence of permission. Purported logo for a long-defunct football team openly described by uploader as "purely fictional" and "obtained... without permission".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

-- Andre Carrotflower (talk) 02:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tonawanda Kardex.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tonawanda Kardex.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of NFL season templates

Hi there - I have nominated all of the NFL's team season templates, some of which you created, for deletion. You can find the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#NFL team season templates. Thanks, PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dick Stuart.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dick Stuart.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Oorang Marker.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Oorang Marker.jpg, which you've attributed to Marion County Historical Society and Ohio Historical Society. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bill Virdon.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bill Virdon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗plicit 08:46, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Three Rivers Classic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Three Rivers Classic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vern Law.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vern Law.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Justin Strzelczyk, 2004.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Justin Strzelczyk, 2004.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pittsburgh Duquesne players

A tag has been placed on Category:Pittsburgh Duquesne players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:13, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

== Nomination of E. Bobadash for deletion ==

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E. Bobadash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. Bobadash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cbl62 (talk) 02:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ralph Meadow for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Meadow is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Meadow until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cbl62 (talk) 18:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruel Redinger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruel Redinger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruel Redinger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Therapyisgood (talk) 19:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marv Smith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marv Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marv Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Therapyisgood (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stan Robb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stan Robb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stan Robb until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Therapyisgood (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Comer (American football) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Comer (American football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Comer (American football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Therapyisgood (talk) 19:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Larry Green for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Larry Green is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Therapyisgood (talk) 19:28, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Willie Flattery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willie Flattery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willie Flattery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Therapyisgood (talk) 19:30, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Al Young (American football, born 1902) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al Young (American football, born 1902) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Young (American football, born 1902) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BilledMammal (talk) 01:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Johnny Hendren for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Johnny Hendren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Hendren until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 12:32, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Niles Crowites

The article Niles Crowites has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources - WP:NOTDATABASE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ITBF (talk) 14:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vivian Hultman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vivian Hultman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivian Hultman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 03:48, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of North Central Florida Chapter of NIGP

The article North Central Florida Chapter of NIGP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This organization article is missing independent, reliable sources to establish notability. After searching, found social media and directory websites, but no comprehensive, in-depth coverage of this specific organization. Article was created on 30 November 2009.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Western Pennsylvania Professional Football Circuit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Western Pennsylvania Professional Football Circuit, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Pennsylvania Professional Football Circuit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Celts 21.gif

The file File:Celts 21.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Image has been replaced with an SVG version.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Matt Deres (talk) 02:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]