User talk:Penciljunk

Welcome...

Hello, Penciljunk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Xiner (talk, email) 19:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Xiner (talk, email) 19:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 15:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestling

Heya, I know I can get a bit passionate about my opinions (as on grappling) hope you agree that the edits on wrestling were good faith. --Nate 12:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your work on the wrestling article, I just have one comment to make: The current version completely omits mention of "show wrestling", i.e. things like professional wrestling, wrestling at fairs, etc. Since this is our article about wrestling in general, those "disciplines" and their origin should be included as well. It's also possible that we should have two additional overview articles for sport wrestling and show wrestling, but in any case, this article should serve as an introduction to both subjects. Zocky | picture popups 16:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grappling

I think your opinion on grappling is completely wrong and that you should stop editing that article... Hey, just kidding! :-) Don't take me seriously! I did like a lot to hear your arguments on the grappling and FILA issues, and I liked even more your good temper and consistency at replying. It's nice to discuss such things in a constructive manner like you did. You really have a strong point, our (not yours) grappling perceptions still need citations to be NPOV, even though they seem to be so, let me say, obivous (to us :-). Regards. Loudenvier 20:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing talk pages

You should not delete comments from article talk pages even if they are your own. It keeps things in context. You could have self promoted the article to B-class no big thing as long as the criteria are met. Higher is more difficult. I suggest that after the article stabilizes - say in a month - submit it to peer review.Peter Rehse 01:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grappling noun

Made some comments on the wrestling talk page, discussing, it would be preferable to an edit war. --Nate1481(^t/_c) 14:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestling GA status

Please see the wrestling talk page for information on why the article does not meet the GA criteria. I am confident that if these issues are met then this article will become a good article in the future. T Rex | talk 02:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Wrestling Nerd

Thanks for your contributions to the wrestling articles. I just got through doing a overhaul of the articles, Amateur wrestling, Freestyle wrestling, Greco-Roman wrestling, and Collegiate Wrestling. I didn't do a big edit on the Amateur Wrestling article, but tended to give focus to the particular styles, especially the international ones. The articles on Freestyle wrestling and Collegiate wrestling have pictures for the first time, and I added a few more photos to the Greco-Roman wrestling page. (Some of the photos on the Collegiate Wrestling page, as of now only 7, still have issues left over regarding free licensing, but I've already contacted the photographers about changing their licenses to a free one.) For the articles on Freestyle and Greco-Roman, I've made sure I cited the international wrestling rules published by FILA. For the article on Collegiate wrestling, I've made sure to cite the references to the official rules given by the NCAA.

I've also added the histories of Freestyle, Greco-Roman, and Collegiate wrestling to their respective pages and cited their respective sources.

Since in your words you are an "unapologetic wrestling nerd", could you look over the articles I've articles to check their accuracy and verifiability, especially with regard to the wrestling rules for all three styles? Also, I was wondering if you are able to get access to a copy of the high school (scholastic) wrestling rules published by the National Federation of State High School Associations, the body that governs scholastic wrestling for U.S. high schools. They don't have it online. If so, thanks. Nothing could get more official for a primary source than having the latest rules for high school wrestling. It would be great if you could check over and cite the rulebook for the section "High School Level" on the Collegiate wrestling page.

Please leave any comments on the edits and suggestions for the articles on my user talk page, or on the articles' talk page(s). Thank you very much. -- Wikiman86 22:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Wrestling Articles

Just got this request on WP:WPMA thought you might be able to help. --Nate1481(^t/_c) 10:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]