User talk:Peminatweb

Welcome!

Hello, Peminatweb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rankersbo (talk) 06:29, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the guidance, Rankersbo! Peminatweb (talk) 06:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Keith Paterson, Age UK's joint Internet Champion for 2012.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Keith Paterson, Age UK's joint Internet Champion for 2012.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 11:15, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Keith Paterson

Hi, I am not actually reviewing this article. I mainly do admin round WP:AfC and I did tidy up your article. It is waiting for the queue for review. It is in the queue for review and you will get a message when the review is done with a message here and guidance on the page itself. Rankersbo (talk) 06:29, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for tidying up the article, Rankersbo. I guess the changes that you made are not visible in my Sandbox? Peminatweb (talk) 06:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Paterson (October 24)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Keith Paterson.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Peminatweb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at AfC Keith Paterson was accepted

Keith Paterson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:25, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ritchie333, Thank you for accepting and spending much time on editing my first effort at contributing to Wikipedia. I shall look into your comments and act on them accordingly when I am able to do so. In the meantime all my best wishes in your untiring effort to make Wikipedia a reliable and encyclopedic source of information for all. Peminatweb (talk) 20:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keith Paterson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keith Paterson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Paterson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:38, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The question of the "notability" of a person is highly subjective and in the event of no agreement being reached as to whether Keith Paterson's being crowned "Internet Champion" by a well-established and highly-reputable institution such as Age UK, may I be allowed to suggest that the article be preserved. ~~