User talk:Pelegius

Welcome!

Hello Pelegius, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Laura Scudder ☎ 22:43, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley

I notice you stated in an edit summary that Stanley is only one of several towns in the Falkland Islands. In the UK, "town" is a somewhat vague term, but is usually restricted to places which have received a charter. In the Falklands, I doubt that any settlement has received a charter of this type, so the statement that it is the only town is somewhat misleading. However, its size and importance means that Stanley is often referred to as a town, whereas the other very small settlements would not be. Warofdreams talk 00:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I was not aware of this, and perhaps the terms should not be used where confusion might arise. Pelegius 01:02, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Cp religion.jpg and Image:DrFreeman.jpg

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cp religion.jpg and Image:DrFreeman.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Laura Scudder ☎ 08:18, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if the works are copyrighted (I am guessing not), but, if they are, then this is fair use. Pelegius 18:56, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Every work created in the United States is automatically copyrighted until it enters the public domain (70 years after the creator's death). There's a number of requirements to qualify as fair use that're outlied at Wikipedia:Fair use. I think they might specifically fail the attribution and the material must contribute significantly to the article criteria. If you are unsure whether it qualifies, simply mark it with {{fairusereview}} and someone who knows a lot about it will take a look. — Laura Scudder ☎ 19:46, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The photographers were not credited on the page I took these from (a school website.)

Opera

Gratias ago. Sed noli tangere superfacie usori. I don't know if I got that right. Thanks for the correctiones. But you are not supposed to touch the user page. But you've saved me the embarrassment. I am glad to meet a fellow enthusiast in Latin. I am trying to learn Latin. I wish I could enroll in Classice here or in the Philippines. Best regards,--Jondel 00:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

my user page

thanks for fixing the latin "Pax Vobis" to the correct version :-) Gryffindor 10:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SatyrSmall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SatyrSmall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move request for emperors of the Palaeologus/Palaiologos dynasty

Hi. There is a move request for several Palaeologus/Palaiologos dynasty emperors at Talk:List of Byzantine Emperors. I tought you might be interested in.--Panairjdde 21:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination

Please make sure to provide a helpful edit summary (per the instructions and big red box) when editing the nominations list in future. This will help us keep the Good Articles wikiproject running more efficiently. Thanks. -- Run! 09:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology

Since you are interested in flags and emblems I would like to inform you that the WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology has just been created. Why not take a look? I hope you can join. Inge 21:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Dd best.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dd best.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logo home v2.gif

Thank you for uploading Image:Logo home v2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:299.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:299.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:20, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 04:20, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:1998-10 ONDERDONK 450.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:1998-10 ONDERDONK 450.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:36, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mary Rohde Scudday for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Rohde Scudday is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Rohde Scudday until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kinu ^t/_c 06:07, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Johnston.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Johnston.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Satyr image?

File:SatyrSmall.jpg

Hello. You posted this image, describing it as a satyr. How sure are you of that? The figure in the picture appears to have human legs, rather than goat's legs, which makes me doubt that it's a satyr. Is it the right picture? Could satyrs have human legs? J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 15:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TexasMilitaryInstituteTXJROTCSLI.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TexasMilitaryInstituteTXJROTCSLI.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SatyrSmall.jpg

The file File:SatyrSmall.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid PD-art, this is not a 2D work.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 13:39, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul K. Davis (historian) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul K. Davis (historian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul K. Davis (historian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheNuggeteer (talk) 11:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]