User talk:Pejman7

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Pejman7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! cab (talk) 02:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iranians in the Netherlands

This edit was not appropriate. You used a misleading edit summary, deleted a citation, and inserted information which is not verifiable. Please see Talk:Iranians in the Netherlands and address the concerns there before repeating these edits. cab (talk) 03:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts, for more information please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shayan7. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety ^talk 10:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have been blocked by mistake

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pejman7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I have been blocked because someone think I am 'shayan7', while I am not. I will be grateful if you follow the matter please.

Decline reason:

WP:DUCK based on the similarity of usernames, the intersect on articles edited, the common use of grammar and style. This account is indefinately blocked, and the other is blocked for only a week - go back to your main account, and don't make the block longer (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Review again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pejman7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, please review my request again. Regarding the similarity between Pejman7 and Shayan7 please note that 7 is the holy number in many cultures so it's possible that everyone use that! I have ckecked the contributions of shayan7, I also can see that some of his/her ideas about Persian/Iranian studies entries are similar to mine but that issue also does not mean that I am him/her either! I am mostly active here in the field of music/musicians. Please review the case again and let me continue to contribute to music entries. I also try to pay more attention to wiki rules. Thanks for your attention.

Decline reason:

No. At least four different users, including now three SPI clerks, are in agreement that this account looks and sounds like a sock. Therefore, it will remain blocked. In addition, your talk page access is revoked, since these requests have been nothing but a waste of time. Tim Song (talk) 09:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The decision is unfortunate. I was correcting the wrong music entries and a few other things

{{unblock: I don't know who is Shayan7. Lately I was correcting music entries. Wikipedia's Persian music entries are full of mistakes and wrong information. The editors should be happy that someone with enought knowlege in this field is correcting them and add the references. If Some of my point Regarding Nowruz is similar to other use it's not reasonable tp block ME. The decision is really disappointing. I want to have my account to continue my contributions.}}

Proposed deletion of Faryad (song)

The article Faryad (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 10:45, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]