User talk:Pege.founder

Welcome

Hello, Pege.founder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Euchiasmus 19:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From cow shit to manure

Great! I just added today an article about Biomass gasification and was a little bit concerned about my English.

Now 8 hours later, I found my article translated to real English.

--Pege.founder 18:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wheel chair with Mecanum wheels

Just thought to add a new sensation to the wheel chair section and was surprised by Your photo dated 1980.

Do You know more about the history of this wheel chair?

Any possible reason, why something first time shown 1980 is a fair sensation in 2006?

Mecanum wheel chair shown on the EVER Monaco 2006

I remember the wheelchair I photographed at an exhibition/conference in the early eighties caused quite a stir - lots of people wanting to try it, because its totally free movement was quite unlike anything else - like floating, but with complete control. You could move the joystick in any direction and the chair moved in that direction; you could also twist the joystick and you would turn round. The two movements could, of course, be combined if you wish.

I think it must have been a prototype, but I can't really remember (25 years ago is a long time!) and I was subsequently quite disappointed not to see them around. So I was delighted to follow your link and see that, at last, the idea is being taken forward, especially since I know someone who would probably like one.

So why has it taken so long? I wondered at the time if the cost was prohibitive, but now I'm wondering if the sale of the mecanum wheel patent to the US Navy had anything to do with it. Their particular use for it was in vehicles to get around tight spaces on ships, and probably didn't involve building wheelchairs. I'm only guessing.

I think patents give exclusive rights to a technology for something like 20 years, so once that period is up, other companies can use the idea.

Any idea how much they cost? Euchiasmus 19:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. --Kbh3^rd talk 01:30, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent!

Thank you for the important information you have added on Talk:Plug-in hybrid. I have replied to your comments there. ←Ben^B4 10:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized -- you took those photos on your site, didn't you? Would you please consider releasing them under the GFDL or a Creative Commons license (such as CC-BY-SA)? Then we could use your pictures in Wikipedia. When people click on them, they will see a link to your site and a link to the source of the photo. ←Ben^B4 11:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So awesome! The one I was thinking of was this Kangoo (and any other angles of it if you have them.) Thank you so much for making these available. ←Ben^B4 12:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Renault-Kangoo-Plug-in-hybrid2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Renault-Kangoo-Plug-in-hybrid2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

corrected my failure to forget selecting the license type --Pege.founder 19:21, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to thank you so much again. The red Kangoo we have -- to be perfectly honest I am not sure whether it is an Elect'Road. ←Ben^B4 01:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Renault Kangoo

Is Renault's plug-in hybrid back in production or is it just a concept at this point? CME94 12:25, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Far better and stronger with a complete new drive system and Lithium iron phospaht batteries. --Pege.founder 19:28, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Gemini-house-2001.jpg

File:Gemini-house-2001.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Gemini-house-2001.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Gemini-house-2001.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:19, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ever-monaco-prince-albert.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Ever-monaco-prince-albert.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:57, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ever-monaco-grimaldi-forum.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Ever-monaco-grimaldi-forum.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roland Mösl

The article Roland Mösl has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Enfcer (talk) 02:56, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can provide source, I looked at other articles how to make this, but it looked to complicate for the first. Tomorrow is my flight back from Manila to Salzburg, so I can go in the references only next Tuesday after I am at home again --Pege.founder (talk) 16:25, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gemini-house-1994.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gemini-house-1994.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gemini-house-1992.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gemini-house-1992.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Renault-Kangoo-Plug-in-hybrid.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Renault-Kangoo-Plug-in-hybrid.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Renault-Kangoo-Hybride-Engine.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Renault-Kangoo-Hybride-Engine.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have stated, that I am the copyright holder of all 4 pictures. Just make a simple form with this instead of highly complicated emails with mucch statements. Pege.founder (talk) 12:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]