Jump to content

User talk:Pedwick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pedwick (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not this "Nimbly6" guy. I can't see how anyone could have came to such a conclusion given the mere 5 minuets between my edit of an article in good faith (supported by a valid explanation of why I was doing so I might add) and my being blocked. This action was an unsupported snap decision on the part of my blocker. Pedwick (talk) 15:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Two + two=four. Please don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining (as the saying goes). — Daniel Case (talk) 18:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't deny that 92.19.79.92 was me, but I don't see how making an edit before creating an account and then supporting my reason for it makes me a sock puppet of Nimbly. Where is the connection between me and him? Pedwick (talk) 18:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]