User talk:Pedro Bestler

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tony Samara. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. —James ^{(Talk • Contribs)} • 1:14pm • 03:14, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tony Samara

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tony Samara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pichpich (talk) 04:35, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Meditation Leaders

Category:Meditation Leaders, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 04:37, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Pedro Bestler/Tony Samara has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tony Samara, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 14:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please swiftly remove your article promoting "Tony Samara"

You patently have a connection to Samara, and promote him elsewhere on the internet. However, aside from the weasel words ("many people consider him" and so on), the lack of references / research and the fact that it's badly written, the article is essentially an advertising page. Samara is merely another in a very long line of self-promoting demagogues. I have not touched the article, but have left a similar conclusion on the talk page.
Ironically, you're creating bad karma. Please remove the article before a Wikipedia member does it for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.238.56 (talk) 21:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Conscious Spirituality Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Conscious Spirituality Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:38, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Tony Samara

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Tony Samara, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://tonysamara.org/lang_en/tonyUK.htm (The career section is almost a full copy of this page.), and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Tony Samara and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Tony Samara, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Tony Samara with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Tony Samara. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Tony Samara saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! _W^\|/_haledad (Talk to me) 17:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep your cool in that AfD discussion; the back and forth you got involved in is not helpful to your cause. The more text you put in there, the less likely other editors are to get involved with the discussion which so far does not seem to go your way. Less is more. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove false accusation

[1]: You are accusing me of violating the law. That's a very serious false accusation. Please substantiate that claim or retract it immediately.

For clarity: I did not reveal any private details of you. You chose to submit an article about a close friend of yours, clearly against a number of WP recommendations re. Conflict of Interest. You chose to submit this article using your own name. When Bonkers calls out your CoI by clarifying that you are a distributor for Tony Samara, you flat out deny this: "am not a distributor for anybody. You seem to be insinuating that the conflict of interest is that I am promoting Tony Samara in order to sell more products and make more money for myself or himself and this is far removed from the truth. Tony Samara is not connected to any business, I am not a distributor for anybody and really do not see how anything relates to anything else with such non objective groundings." Using publicly available whois information for Theriaca domain names and a public Theriaca distributor list, I expose that you ARE in fact a Theriaca distributor in at least NINE European countries. Now, I understand that you don't like the fact that in the cause of the AfD discussion several of your lies are exposed, but no law was violated in doing so. I'm also not accusing you of violating any laws, while the lies that you have written in the AfD discussion do expose the values that you live by (and reflect badly on Tony Samara and his group) they are not against any laws.
Again: note how you inject the words "truth" or "truthful" in almost every posting you make, while you have posted more lies than anybody I know. _W^\|/_haledad (Talk to me) 13:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All your non objective talk and digging up is infringing on my privacy and in my opinion nothing to do with Wikipedia. Pedro Bestler (talk) 06:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which law did I violate, and how? If you cannot answer this simple question, remove your false accusation. _W^\|/_haledad (Talk to me) 17:45, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro, if you wish to settle this the easy way just remove that text. I can't really see a legal threat in there (per WP:NLT, though other admins may feel differently) but it serves no useful purpose and is needlessly inflammatory. This stuff about internet protocol, whatever that may be, is neither here nor there anyway. The material that might have been inappropriate has been removed, and as far as I'm concerned this is over. It would be better for all of us if it were over for you all as well. The other option is that both of you continue escalating, and at some point one or both of you will be blocked, for such things as disruptive editing and/or personal attacks. Please don't let it get that far. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Defamation and non objective criticism regarding a person's sense of correctness is an invasion of privacy. Pedro Bestler (talk) 21:51, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]