User talk:Pediamedia1

Please STOP vandalizing our encyclopedia. You have been warned multiple times and it has been explained to you. --mboverload @ 07:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

American International School

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edits to American International School don't seem to conform to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. For inclusion you will need to show that these criticisms have been published somewhere in mainstream media, and are not just your own opinion. Kevin 09:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Before you replace your edits, read Wikipedia's 3 revert rule. You have 3 reversions in a few hours already, and you may be blocked if you revert again. Kevin 11:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the verification and reliable source policies before you put your criticisms back on this page. I have no objection to them but they must be verifiable by reliable sources. Kevin 07:38, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to be civil in your edit summaries. What you wrote here is a personal attack which is absolutely not on here. You may be blocked if you continue this behaviour. Kevin 10:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hammertime

These quotes are straight from Wikipedia:Verifiability, which is an official and founding policy of Wikipedia.

1. Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources.
2. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable source, or it may be removed by any editor.
3. The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on those seeking to remove it.

"Articles should rely on credible, third-party sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. For academic subjects, the sources should preferably be peer-reviewed. Sources should also be appropriate to the claims made: outlandish claims beg strong sources."

"The burden of evidence lies with the editors who have made an edit or wish an edit to remain. Editors should therefore provide references. If an article topic has no reputable, reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article on that topic."

Thanks! --mboverload @ 10:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three-revert Rule

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in American International School. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- Netsnipe ^(Talk) 11:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy against sockpuppetry, personal attacks. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.

Please identify which of your several accounts you wish to use. This can then be unblocked, provided that you do not continue with tendentious edits, sockpuppetry and incivility. Just zis Guy you know? 12:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]