User talk:Peasetort
Peasetort, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Peasetort! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC) |
Welcome
[edit]
|
--David Tornheim (talk) 11:27, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marbury v. Madison; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --David Tornheim (talk) 11:28, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Please note that when you request a change, you need to follow WP:BRD. If editors disagree, you need to discuss, not force your change on the article. If you can't find agreement with the editor reverting, then seek other non-involved editors to give feedback. I will comment on the section. --David Tornheim (talk) 11:31, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi David, starting a discussion Is common sense stuff but WhiteWhirlwind wasn't interested. is there something else I can try? I've known bigshot named professors who tell every student they encounter that Wikipedia is shite over things like this.
The article Adam Matos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article describes a crime and subsequent trial. Although this drew the usual news coverage typical of such events, there is no evidence of wider or longer-lasting significance; this article on the convicted person falls under WP:1E / WP:CRIMINAL.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)