User talk:Peacetowikied

What previous accounts have you edited under? El_C 14:41, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Last 2 ips this page Adnan Oktar

Please review WP:SIG, WP:INDENT. Why are getting involved in an edit war, contrary to WP:ONUS? El_C 14:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you, i did read all your links. But did you read all deleted sources? Peacetowikied (talk) 14:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am declining to comment on the content dispute at this time. Having a brand new user get immediately involved in a heated conflict is a bit suspect, though, I'm sorry to say. El_C 14:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i joined talk page and asked some questions.Peacetowikied (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: user Konli17 ignore me at 2 talk pages. What can i do now?Peacetowikied (talk) 19:35, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important alert and warning

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL.
The specific details of these sanctions are described here:

All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Just so you know, I am considering banning you from the topic area, broadly construed. A brand new account inserting itself into an edit conflict to edit war is not acceptable. El_C 23:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, did you look the talk page. Peacetowikied (talk) 23:09, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have made two comments there. I found your own comment to have been unhelpful, though. I hate to tell you but that has been pretty much par for the course when it comes to your edits thus far, which is why sanctions seem likely. El_C 23:42, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, i should not had say "dude" Peacetowikied (talk) 23:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, that is not a problem. The problem is that what you say is either too terse to be useful, or is incoherent, or both. El_C 23:49, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia

I have noticed that you are interested in the Kurdish/aramneian/Turkish cultural conflict. I advise you to also bring new info to Wikipedia, and not to revert ethnic, cultural info, as your are still a starer. This might enhance your perception on Wikipedia. If you mainly revert, it's not really seen as constructive. But of course, in the specific area of the conflict, you are welcome to contribute. Just please, with majorly worldwide accepted sources. Best,Paradise Chronicle (talk)

I explained my last 2 reverts. Add please source if kurds forms the majority in these towns.Peacetowikied (talk) 01:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fixed it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Straubook (talk • contribs) 05:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hi there,

Thanks for adding your image to the page Homosexuality. However, the image seemed incongruous and unnecessary for the page. I have therefore reverted your edit.

Please let me know on my talk page or on the page’s talk page if it want to discuss with me and others.

Thanks,

AussieWikiDan (talk) 05:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Crossroads ^-talk- 05:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Picture question

If this is you, then why was the picture uploaded by a different account named Gayinspandex1? Crossroads ^-talk- 06:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He was my cameraman. Peacetowikied (talk) 09: 08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing (persistent provocations).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 13:36, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peacetowikied (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Come on! I did one mistake on a controversial topic. Why you give me already indefinite block. Since my first edits you do not like me and threaten me by a topic bans but you go for indefinite block. Because of 1 mistake this is not fair! Peacetowikied (talk)

Decline reason:

I don't buy that. Your gravedancing username, your immediate jump into controversial topics, and your outright trolling (such as at [1]) make me think this block quite justified. So if you wish you be unblocked, you'll need to ask for forgiveness and show maturity. See WP:GAB for a guide on how to do so. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Gen, Semih Terzi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gen, Semih Terzi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]