User talk:Pdecalculus

Welcome!

Hello, Pdecalculus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ajaxfiore (talk) 02:22, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nengo

In response to your diff here, two small steps have been taken.

The Nengo redirect page has been converted into a disambiguation page; and
A stub article about a Neural Engineering Object has been drafted.

It is possible that the notability of this subject may be challenged? --Enkyo2 (talk) 01:58, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

-- Thanks Enkyo, have some experts in the nengo community adding many notability elements. Pdecalculus (talk) 17:12, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No Paid Edits Per New Terms added in 2014

This will disclose that I am a retired math professor, roboticist and computational music teacher, and edit Wikipedia for the sake of users, and am not paid for my work. I am wealthy and a large donor to Wiki and other educational nonprofits. I have no bias in my edits, and most are scientific and technical, and you don't make much money promoting Euler or Katherine Freese.

This note is to meet the new editing requirements implemented as terms in 2014 that paid editing be stopped or at least disclosed. I'm guessing this practice is likely more prevalent in PR agencies writing about companies or business issues than science, but I suppose Universities hire PR firms too! Bravo to Wikimedia for attempting to stay unbiased. I guess, if you believe recent reports, I'm sadly also one of the few female editors, even though as a professional programmer I'm still just learning wiki markup, policies and practices. Being female makes me less comfortable with a heavy rule-driven culture, which of course Emile Durkheim called "the principle cause for suicide." (Kidding!).

I do love that the Wiki lawyers advised that you should edit Wiki "for fun." Now what's the legal term for that? Some of the pit bull admins, I have to say, don't seem to be having a lot of fun here. OK, I have too thin of skin for this culture, but with a library of over 100,000 technical texts can't resist contributing, at least cites. ;=)Pdecalculus (talk) 13:51, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Root extraction

Hi, Root extraction still needs a major cleanup, there's a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Disambiguation#Root extraction (disambiguation)- Is it even warranted? where I suggest you may want to go in one of two directions, which I will leave for you. Until then, the cleanup tag should stay as about 90% is deletable as a dab page. Widefox; talk 13:12, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Noticed someone changed it from a dab to an article, which agrees with and fixes your concerns, but also raises many new issues! Maybe this is a subtle deletion strategy that I'm dumb to: change the nature, then, when it doesn't fit the new nature, delete! I'm really starting to understand the competitive male culture here. Pdecalculus (talk) 17:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Root extraction. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Be familiar with the guidelines and style
Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in an article, and include the "blue link" to that article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Here's some links so you know about the format... Widefox; talk 13:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your help on this. I started it as a disambig page, then it was edited to become an article as folks didn't think it should be a disambig, so now it is a broad "disambig/article" without a central theme as an article. It is admittedly a very vast topic, which makes it tough to decide which meaning should be the "primary" article so all others can move to a new disambig. I suppose the taking of polynomial roots would do, unless you're a dentist or tree remover!! Pdecalculus (talk) 19:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sadness at project removal

I found the request for the retirement places article on an open article request project, then took several weeks to create the article. Not knowing the "voting procedure" I then watched helplessly as the article was deleted. It had risen to prominence on Google, and numerous US cities were backlinking to it, enhancing wiki and adding to knowledge. This is not a big deal, but was curious that it was requested as an article, and when I did it, was then 86ed! I'll know a "little" better next time that finding a request on a project page is no guarantee that the article will be worth working on.

Scholarship post

I read on a project page that Wiki is encouraging scholars to post credentials to help with article and citation requests. Bachelors: University of Michigan, Masters (Math/quant analysis/stats): U Wisconsin, PhD U Wisc, Scripps, Carnegie Mellon. Areas: Engineering, Software Development, Math, Big Data/Audio and Video/visualization data, RNA folding, Domain specific language development, Robotics, STEM teaching. Languages: C, C#, Lisp, Java, Python, IDA Pro, Linux, many circuit level/hex projects. I'm not sure if this should also go on project pages, but am putting it on talk in case anyone needs help, especially with citations. The foundation I now volunteer for has over a million volumes and I have over 100K also, so am happy to help with inlines right to the relevant page number. Pdecalculus (talk) 16:00, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Preferred walking speed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stride. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: This disambig is the only article covering stride since the topic itself needs an article and the disambig intro covers the most common meaning.Pdecalculus (talk) 16:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Douglas Kutach

The article Douglas Kutach has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Pdecalculus!

Thank you for voting.

If you wish, you may retain the following receipt as evidence of your vote:

SPID: 11315

BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

Version: GnuPG v1

hQEMA1meU4mWJCh8AQf+JdaCNo9ZBxlOyTuXR0rLUqwXSLiXJsylnM/42DkqJG0D GoNllE1jjPWuZ/RecegMSRNTdTjcqnXXvl7/L20LJLO58gMQaocHJYUobph0rXp3 7K76zWKyctNnBo3Wr4WnM+P0F63LTTbqyJdMv+U53mIB8azt1IWiYSBGBL5SQtQ5 xESTIOFPCqy5bH8Yq2yq5+lKmSifdhz/nciZrPW2TTfclawmeTphJrpQPWPTzh7n Bhv+KH9e6nbcpSYAPpnqcuZjfs9HBfl/JDshyUXaefCDsnufgYyUf+KTcXZJaWQw pspOe3N8a4N/0Y9luIaTOq63y1S4LyqVBVDLQI4dtdLqAdc60ijd0a36WvYxi8XI 7FALC7Er1fBwyZf9aZNXjogSu6ZFE6T0wMN+SMI1M2eKujkQEctvJgH2bOCYrPM8 ymxLLG28IfbEfkQPXs5yhteVemGcuEqwINQrnbouAOaMKf4/JTvq+QjBf8kLNKUW LlosjcrARt6SrcS14WzNqOo/UVVHAF6+lmBV2cnhDmjk6o9LhFnmpCuzqc8kOiij zlcMWkFgM3zS2280WkQ9qS4A+RmWGpnjXxTraYu/nzgmQYaqJJHSA29bmn8+Uhz7 R9deHTfr8o8nkt+koNBoo11vuXKX/phfYe64zAmtlyruc9LLV+FeXoL4m21xq9xZ xym3ACPNsFN+yGBvhlRXhfnpoSsHj6bfn8/m8vcrsGJroMiKQW/41yan9cHUaaIr 4vpI3KRcV73i1BDRXC2R2QUr7A+H8I2z4Rm/oc8Axr/k/HVZjRHkPKsMcOJXuh4o tIdpvpMMyRXBKHIWFmANKlSGeHX/Ro1Jvs44I8m9o+h1i1/twV8FSQce+8nQ6eAn nEUYdVGdD4chUQtdNDWJARKyr1/Zcu4siUOOZkEZ6q+0aDrLGfbKPBplsGJVG7My SUy8rB1+h/cewgj5CrL4oswII0H5BD2CHHJ2Ul8M/ZLfsLhxijODni7eQBp4wC58 jeBVdAQxeJ/OANFoHh8vktLH+scYRYT5mvNO5EdYxCj0mu2EkRErmle02j6PSQWO BCKvbKHe/DrEqmCNGxaH/0sY918MGSvtjTxsw/XOlVrJbi+ZhZnoYbjFHXO5po/4 kft8Eu/JlUuBV+vBzSrmAcVS2fBEQ9io2CR33mRGFhe7+bpnlqXZEJC8nFFDobpX kxdoclfX9PotGm3ZIvlbVi702OT2sEVV43lfbq34716l0QBUvF1NXjlPm+OcPmrb jD3Dslok7gbrWeXODqUtpaAlYquw8mam1wrO9VpJWivWlXWkBDs3Dad4gdssS49S rsCS0Kc5GKEoa6Et73xZD0QgB71XwhtHsVbw3AqeiiRfyOYA7xKutnyM/DKp501N DnlCbrU2e1YLS0LUSY4oQSXxcVzwuocCgUQ5m4KbxiJY6DEeaprqXR0NZU2CRXBw 6NuoGIa9oxxzSZdbmgqia7RbbNqpcv9cW8eJDahAwGYcrDY9wjA+xRulh0YJ8isW DMpjaxHJL9jZOa0/Qldk5sFiriyDFsr1FUA+Snx1b5PEmUcNtU7SrtehqddZrHnc 3AZAiWqutwX/r8YYAlrezJIg5bOG8ZukFTmMDdlWB4u+WC12Q8a1hEpWptrVwByr qwAYe14wHMLKuWY0yV1T0QqYadlwpJfjDlUSE1n2eHVHC89PIeEGuif6pVOucK+K NzBMmneXb3hNXAw9TbFBFeENMvp82znw4xlUb5M8sYy7R+8C5T5vRXd4C6j2Hj5O 8Vc= =JdX1

END PGP MESSAGE-----

DISCLOSURE: MY STRONG SUPPORT GIVEN TO OPA BIN, MARK BERNSTEIN, NE ENT, AND CALLANECC

Nomination of MixSCAN for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MixSCAN is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MixSCAN until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bazj (talk) 22:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pdecalculus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pdecalculus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pdecalculus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Construct (information technology)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Construct (information technology), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Data Structure. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Data Structure, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ethanpet113 (talk) 03:38, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Micro landschaft for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Micro landschaft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micro landschaft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Noahfgodard (talk) 16:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]