User talk:Pcharito

File permission problem with File:PeterJenni1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:PeterJenni1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 18:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:PeterJenni2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:PeterJenni2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 18:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Peter Jenni was accepted

Peter Jenni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stomachworm88 (talk) 02:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ProfilePeterJenni.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:ProfilePeterJenni.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 15:26, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PJenniprof.jpg has also been deleted. Please do not upload any more images under CERN copyright. This is not a free licence as we define it since it allows educational and informational use only and restricts commercial use. January (talk) 09:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paolo Giubellino (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paolo Giubellino.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for
your contributions
to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anon126 (talk - contribs) 23:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Pcharito, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Important message re your draft article on Paolo Giubellino

Please see my important message at the Articles for Creation Help Desk here. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 16:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ALICE: A Large Ion Collider Experiment, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages QCD and Confinement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Paolo Giubellino

Pcharito, your article was nominated for DYK a couple of weeks ago at the above link by someone who has since been blocked. We were wondering whether you wanted to pursue the nomination, or would prefer if it were withdrawn. Successful DYK nominations are featured in the "Did You Know" section of the main page. Because they are on the main page, there are a set of standards that the articles must meet to qualify, and this includes far more inline source citations than your article has now; we have stricter standards than Articles for Creation.

The rule of thumb at DYK is that each paragraph has to contain at least one inline source citation. For your article, that means over a dozen additional source citations would need to be added.

Please let us know what you'd like to do; just drop us a note at the linked address in the above section title. We hope to hear from you within a week's time. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:28, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pcharito, thanks for responding, and my apologies for missing it. For DYK, responses are supposed to be on the nomination template itself—the link I gave—not its talk page. I didn't notice it, since those talk pages are almost never used.

Do you think you could make the requested improvements within a two week period? We normally like to see work begin within a week, and that progress is being made, but recognize that this isn't always possible. Please respond either here or on the actual template page above. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:39, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it's been over two weeks since the above, and you haven't edited since March 13, the day you posted your question. I'm afraid time has run out on this nomination; I'm going to mark it for closure. Regards, BlueMoonset (talk) 20:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BlueMoonset, Thank you for your message and I apologize for the delay in my response but I have been traveling over the last two weeks and I am still away from my desk. I am sorry for missing the deadline and please let me know if this page is reconsidered for DYK nomination in the future. I would love to further work on the edits. I went through some changes (adding more citations) but probably I haven't understood what exactly was required/expected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.85.210.197 (talk) 16:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ALICE: A Large Ion Collider Experiment, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charge and CMS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paolo Giubellino may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[http://www.ep.ph.bham.ac.uk/SQM2013/Committees.html| Strange Quark Matter 2013 Official Website]></ref>, ICPAQGP). He has served as referee for several major international Physics Journals, among
at the 25th International Nuclear Physics Conference (INPC 2013) <ref>[http://www.inpc2013.it{ INPC 2013 Official Website]</ref> in June 2013, and chaired sessions in numerous international

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paolo Giubellino may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[http://www.ep.ph.bham.ac.uk/SQM2013/Committees.html| Strange Quark Matter 2013 Official Website]></ref>, ICPAQGP). He has served as referee for several major international Physics Journals, among
at the 25th International Nuclear Physics Conference (INPC 2013) <ref>[http://www.inpc2013.it{ INPC 2013 Official Website]</ref> in June 2013, and chaired sessions in numerous international

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pcharito. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Future Circular Collider, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CMS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Missing decade in your FCC timeline graph

Hello Pcharito, thanks for your contributions to the FCC documentation on Wikipedia. I noticed an oversight in your picture illustrating the timeline of various accelerator projects: it skips from 2005 to 2025, leaving a whole decade missing. Could you possibly correct the picture and upload a new version? Thanks in advance, kind regarde. — JFG ^talk 17:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will update a new timeline reflecting also the present status of the FCC study (following the 2019 update of the European Strategy for particle Physics. Pcharito (talk) 08:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]