User talk:Pcbd

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from John Burroughs School. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Databasecoordinator, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Allowing username change to Pcbd (talk · contribs). Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking.

Request handled by: (talk→ BWilkins ←track)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Burroughs Prom Stuff

Hi, Pcbd. Sorry we started off on the wrong foot. Just so you know...I didn't delete your previous edits. I only restored what I--and others--had written. You deleted the entire section, which actually counts as "vandalism"(note the first entry on your talk page). I'm sure that's not what you intended. Let's work together on this. Druid135 (talk) 23:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yes I suppose we did start off on the wrong foot; I notice in the editing history that you say that judging from my history I am "something of a vandal"...yes it's true, at one point I tried to delete the whole prom thing, not having received any reason for its existence.

I understand that you consider it a notable event in the school's history and that it demonstrates positive aspects of the school, but let's be honest, won't most readers see it as demonstrating negative and undesirable aspects of the school? And I wonder if you have read:

http://www.jburroughs.org/news-and-events/2009-prom/

It seems like adding a quote from that page would be fairer than using just the quote saying what a relief it is that no protesters showed up. Two examples of quotes from that web page include:

"The invitation was not carefully reviewed; it went out without authorization by school authorities....We apologize for this lack of oversight."

"To those in the larger community, who do not know Burroughs well, please accept our apology for this incident and understand that this was a mistake from which we will grow."

That's just if there is any reason for covering this incident at all, which I guess is an area where we disagree.

Whatever student designed the invitations in the first place probably did not give permission to the recipients to reprint them in the newspaper. Actually I wonder if they really designed them 100% or if they lifted them from someone else anyway, thinking that it was only being sent to a group of students rather than being in the newspaper (not that I'm defending that either). But anyway, I guess you're saying that if the newspaper reprinted it for public consumption (with or without the designer's permission), then it's OK to put it up on Wikipedia too. Seems odd that it's the only graphic on the entire page; not a very balanced picture of what the school is about. I've copied the school's logo and a photograph from off the web site and I've submitted them to be posted on the Wikipedia page. So, that will be another step towards more balance. Pcbd (talk) 19:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. I agree on all accounts. It doesn't make sense to have the only graphic be that of the prom invite. Let's add others. Concerning the quotes...let's add the quotes you suggested. Be sure to footnote them with a link to that page. More apologies, this time for the "vandal" comment. I'll see if there's a way I can re-edit that post.

Druid135 (talk) 04:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is May 2012 and the paragraph about the prom from three years ago is still on this Wikipedia page. Is there any reason to leave it up there, or can it be deleted? Anyone? Class? Bueller? Pcbd (talk) 19:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A week has passed since that question. So, there is no objection to deleting the whole paragraph, right? (I don't know how to get prompts via e-mail whenever someone makes a change. I thought that "watching" a page was the way to do that, but apparently it isn't.) I don't mean to take anyone by surprise but I also don't know how else to double check regarding this. Pcbd (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We've had this discussion before. Please stop blanking sections. It is considered vandalism. Druid135 (talk) 11:07, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so someone out there DOES still want that paragraph to appear. Now we know! Like I wrote on May 15, I didn't mean to take anybody by surprise. Still, I'm unclear on the rules. Two weeks ago, and then one week ago, I posted my question about whether this paragraph could be deleted, but nobody responded. Of course, maybe you (Druid135) were on vacation or something; that's legitimate. Maybe I should've kept asking for four weeks in a row, or six weeks in a row. Do you get notifications when someone posts to this talk page? (I don't think I get them, but there must be some way to get notifications of new talk.) And to address my question from May 8... It has been three YEARS since that prom and the related apologies; how many years does this paragraph have to remain up there? Those 17-year-old kids are now off at college (we can assume), and that head of school has retired and moved out of town, and, what is the relevance of this paragraph about the prom of 2009, aside from an effort to make the school look bad? Pcbd (talk) 16:34, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you ask your question on the articles talk page and not on your own. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 17:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jauerback! I've taken it to the article's talk page. Pcbd (talk) 18:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:John Burroughs School name.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:John Burroughs School name.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:17, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:JohnBurroughsSchool photo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JohnBurroughsSchool photo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 17:54, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

At first you added a public domain copyright tag to File:JohnBurroughsSchool photo.jpg and then you added a Creative Commons Attribution tag; it's either one or the other. You can't use both. Under which licence did you really intend to release the image? Unless I hear from you I will assume the first tag to be the valid one. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 04:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]