User talk:Pbstrypsin

Talk to me!

Fritzl case

Can you point out the relevant discussion in regards to your removal of John Jamelske from the "see also" section? The notice in that section states:Please do not add additional cases to this list unless you cite a reliable source comparing the cases. In my edit summary I included a link from MSNBC that directly discusses and compares the two cases. A ni Mate 07:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coup

What did I remove that was sourced? The portion I rewrote, about the events leading up to the coup, was completely inaccurate. If the source said that stuff, it is dead wrong. An accurate account of those events, which I wrote with ample sources from the Agence Mauritanienne d'Information, is available at the Yahya Ould Ahmed El Waghef. Everyking (talk) 08:44, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pdfreeman for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Nrswanson (talk) 23:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. For more information see Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Pdfreeman#User:Pdfreeman

If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|''your reason here''}} below.</nowiki> Toddst1 (talk) 16:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]