User talk:Payasam (Mukul Dube)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 10:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agenda-driven editing

This kind of agenda-driven editing is absolutely prohibited on Wikipedia. If you do it again, you will be sanctioned. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:44, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this comment, I am afraid you cannot withdraw the image that you have donated to Wikipedia. Please read the permission you have given.

In any case, if you want to try to get the image deleted, you need to request it at commons.wikipedia.org. As long as the image exists on commons, the English Wikipedia is free to use it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "agenda" here. In the 1970s I was in a political formation which eventually became the group to which Shehla Rashid now belongs. For a decade I tried to help that group by taking photos of its activities. Yet she has bad-mouthed me on Twitter, where she has tens of thousands of followers while I have none and so cannot say why I did what I did. An old man's anger and hurt, but no "agenda". I looked at Wikimedia Commons but it is a maze and I could not figure out how to make a request.Payasam (Mukul Dube) (talk) 12:23, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I think it is a great picture that you can be proud of. I still see it being used by responsible media, with credits to you and Wikipedia commons. So, why don't you let it rest? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you, it is a good one. Many irresponsible jokers have used it without credit to anyone. When they did not respond to my questions or tried to wriggle out, I sent them angry messages: which was all I could do, given the realities of the legal system in India. Shehla Rashid decided that my criticism of a news agency sent to /three/ newspapers was sent to "/all/ Kashmiri media outlets", that I was "threatening" and that sending her a copy of this and a couple of similar messages was "harassment". I believe in justice and fairness -- a search of the Internet will bring up things I have written. Maybe I should forget about this affair, specially as the girl spoke of "depression" (whether she just felt low or was clinically depressed is not clear) after the UP election and as she faces incessant foul abuse and threats and may have come to regard even people like me as the beasts she meets on the Internet. Payasam (Mukul Dube) (talk) 13:21, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, when we contribute to Wikipedia, we are essentially giving up ownership, for the good of the world. Let us be content with that. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 14:43, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And those who put themselves on Wikipedia also may imagine that they are acting for the good of the world. Bye. Payasam (Mukul Dube) (talk) 19:38, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]