Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at White blood cell. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
The comment the reviewer left was:
A rather arcane topic to have an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to it. It would be much better stylistically (and in terms of attracting viewers to your content) if you merged it with the leukocyte page.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:X lymphocyte and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:X lymphocyte, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, PavlinaJancova!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GeneralPoxter (talk) 01:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
On my talk page, you said: "Hello, I am trying to understand the problem with the content I added to the article Lymphocyte. I believe my English isn’t perfect, because it isn’t my mother-tongue. But can you explain to me please, in which part of the article did I add original research or novel synthesis? I cited the primary source because it is a new thing and any review doesn’t exist. I added two articles from science websites because most people wouldn’t understand the primary article. That’s not a reliable source? Or is it the main problem that it’s a new thing? Not confirmed yet? Described by only one group so far? But I wrote that it’s just a theory. Would it be acceptable if I left the part about the authors' thoughts of the future, rewrite it and improve my grammar? I wrote it because I think it’s an interesting discovery and the article can be rewritten when more information will be available. Thank you for your advice."
This edit 1) used early-stage lab research, 2) speculated about "functional" receptor roles in the cell, 3) suggested a potential unproven role in type I diabetes, and 4) speculated about future uses of an undefined mechanism. On Wikipedia, this is called WP:SYNTH, as it represents your opinion and original research. Medical content for the encyclopedia requires high-quality reviews, as described in WP:MEDREV and the rest of the MEDRS guideline.
Your apparent inexperience with writing English was evident. Why would you be editing the English encyclopedia medical content - which has a very high standard - rather than in your own language? Such an edit as you provided requires other medical editors to fact-check your sources, and invest time to correct the many grammatical errors. You can respond here if you wish further discussion. Good luck. --Zefr (talk) 18:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I thought it isn't my opinion because the authors of the cited article suggested the role in type I diabetes and the other mentioned things. But as I understand now after our discussion, it's not correct to write on wikipedia about topics that haven't been proven yet.
And to answer your question - I didn't choose to edit English wikipedia on my own, we have to improve one article on English wikipedia per semester to pass one of our master subjects at university (advances in immunology). I will find another topic to improve. PavlinaJancova (talk) 18:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, PavlinaJancova. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "X lymphocyte".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Lymphocyte. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Over-interpretation, synthesis, and poor English grammar. Practice more in your sandbox and get help with writing at WP:TEA. Zefr (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
