User talk:Paulus89

Image Tagging Image:Bushclinton2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bushclinton2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Paulus89,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. - Glen 08:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves of a debatable nature

Please do not move pages to nonsensical titles, as you did with Raj Bhakta. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to learn more about moving pages, please see the guidelines on this subject. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Rosie O'Donnell. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Zachary ^talk 22:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Barak Obama.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. · AndonicO ^Talk 15:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jordin Sparks

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jordin Sparks, you will be blocked from editing.

Another Jordin Sparks Warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jordin Sparks, you will be blocked from editing.

Page Blanking

Was there a reason why you did this?. I've reverted it as you didn't leave an edit summary. Feel free to blank it again if I am in error, but please leave a summary!! Ta. Pedro | Chat 13:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- georgetown college in kentucky moved to page georgetown college (kentucky) - 13:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Never, ever, ever use cut and paste to move an article. Use the "Move" tab. --Golbez 18:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:DeanJaneMcAuliffe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DeanJaneMcAuliffe.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:45, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:JackDeGioia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JackDeGioia.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, ‎Noelle Trongone, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Closedmouth 08:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with ‎Noelle Trongone. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Closedmouth 08:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, we all had a laugh, now you might want to check out uncyclopedia.org. Although if you're not seriously funny there, they'll eat you alive! -- But|seriously|folks 08:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disrespectful? I have her picture on my nighttable and I pray to her visage every night before going to bed that she will save my soul. I live for the day that her icy cream will fill the nooks and crannies of my mouth, like so much butter on a still-warm English muffin. However, despite my abject faith in her, she don't get a Wikipedia article. Life's a bitch sometimes. -- But|seriously|folks 08:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Noelle Trongone

Your edits to Noelle Trongone make it less likely the article will survive calls for its deletion. Please read WP:CBALL

Yo, ixnay on the oelleNay article, eh? -- But|seriously|folks 08:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DeanJaneMcAuliffe.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DeanJaneMcAuliffe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, GUCR Constitution, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from "http://studentorgs.georgetown.edu/republicans/?Action=ViewDocument&Mode=Download&ID=13185". As a copyright violation, GUCR Constitution appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. GUCR Constitution has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:GUCR Constitution and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:GUCR Constitution with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:GUCR Constitution.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. WWGB (talk) 02:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Paulus89! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 43 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Jane McAuliffe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]