User talk:Paulley/Archive 2

Thank You Paulley

Hi Paulley, I just wanted to leave you a note thanking you for your wonderful contributions to Wikipedia. I really admire your wrestling-oriented work and would like to converse with you more directly about a project of mine that I'd like you to take part in. Please contact me either at my userpage, nicksentowski@gmail.com, or as fffanatic_03 on Yahoo Messanger. I look forward to hearing from you.

NickSentowski 04:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to say thanks. Your wrestling pages, if what you claim is true, are nothing short of fantastic. I have done all my research on wikipedia, and your articles are massive helps. So, once again, Thanks. Kingfisherswift 18:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've been researching everything - wrestlers, move types, PPVs, the lot. It has been immeasurably useful. Which articles did you create exactly? Kingfisherswift 20:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Layfield (wrestler)

I moved the article to John Layfield (wrestler) in preparation for writing a biography of John Layfield the 17th century theologian who helped translate the King James Version. While I was busy editing the 1000 linked pages to avoid redirects, User:McPhail reversed the move and created an in-article redirect. I really feel that the theologian has a greater claim on being the most notable Layfield and bearer of the primary article name, but I didn't realize the unbelievable depth of professional wrestling coverage on Wikipedia when I started the task. I was about to spend the rest of the morning making things "right" before I was undermined. At this point I'm quite happy to turn my back on the whole mess and let you guys sort out the redirects. -- Dystopos 17:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Konnan

Thanks; it would be nice to have a professional wrestling article on the main page. McPhail 16:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I made a few of the changes that the peer review recommended, but I haven't been able to implement all of them. McPhail 17:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think that could be difficult to wholly implement without gutting the article, though. McPhail 16:44, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The tables could probably be improved upon; I don't know a great deal about coding. I think most of the issues in the Featured Articles rejection and the Peer Review have been addressed, though, so the article might be ready to be nominated once again. McPhail 19:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's probably wise. McPhail 19:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if nothing else, at least the article was improved somewhat. One down, several thousand to go. McPhail 18:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 04:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOD Vandalism

I'll try to keep an eye on the articles in question, but I'm not sure that I can really persuade them to stop reverting. McPhail 19:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked that IP address of at vandal you mentioned earlier indefinetly because of the threat. I think his IP is shared, so it may be lifted later on. If there's any more problems, please send them to WP:AIV so they can be taken care of more quickly. --LBMixPro ^<Sp ^e ^ak|on|it!> 10:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thank you

You're welcome. The first few times I ran into him, I left messages on his talk pages explaining about the manual of style and the various other things he was doing. I've since stopped doing that because he changes his IP everytime and I doubt he would listen anyways. He obviously doesn't read edit summaries, or he would have seen you trying to explain it to him. Well, I now have all his favourite pages on my watchlist, so whenever he pops up, I pull his contribution page up and rollback his edits. Maybe, one day, he'll notice. Unless it's all deliberate. tv316 10:42, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

XPW European Championship

XPW European Championship has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe 04:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do i oppose this proposed deletion? --- Paulley 10:34, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit the article to remove the prod notice. You'll want to provide a short reason in your edit summary, and possibly a long one on the talk page. The person who proposed its deletion felt the event to be "non-notable", so you might want to review WP:NOT and WP:N if you haven't already and try to improve the article.

When you remove the prod notice, someone may feel that the article still should be deleted and send it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for discussion. That'll put a new banner on the article giving you a link to the discussion where you can make your case. (You wouldn't want to remove the new banner, but don't worry, the deletion notices all say right on them whether or not it's okay to take them off.) NickelShoe 12:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UKWA British Tag-Team Championship

Hi Paulley. Whilst I thank you for taking time out to document the history of the UKWA/RBW Tag-Team Championship, I do however find that your version has some errors. you have since reverted my "version" of events back to your own, claiming "un needed info" or something like that. As the owner of the UKWA I would like to point out that a clear consise history of the championship is alot better than general facts. You claim ross jordan and stixx where "rbw" wrestlers, I can assure you I hired them on the 1st show and they where as much RBW as they where UKWA, so where you get this "Title in RBW Camp" talk from I dont know. The Southern Alliance was formed back in the February of 2003, not later that year as described. if you wish to edit the championship, or would like the complete breakdown and history of the championship so you can wikify it [im useless atit really] I'd be more than happy to supply the information. but you can understand where Im coming from, If I was there and it was my creation, you can see how and why Im a little uneasy with the version thats present. contact me at ukwa@hotmail.co.uk

Watch where you get information

Nice to see you've completely taken my Biography of Doc Dean and passed it off as your own, cheers!

I in fact used a previously written article cleaned it up and moved the page to a better name. Also, i do not pass anything off as my own... its not like i tag articles or edits... i simply maintain and clean up other ppls edits... do not throw false acusations at ppl --- Paulley 08:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Easter

lol, thank you --- Paulley 18:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Humphrey

Hi, I just wanted to suggest that the wikipedia really should have an article on Happy Humphrey (William Cobb), not so much for the wrestling really, but because of his unusaly story of being so heavy, losing so much weight, then getting back again. http://www.canoe.ca/SlamWrestlingGuestColumn/schramm_99apr1.html

i will put up a request for it, but you may want to consider writig it yourself --- Paulley 09:12, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did create the inital versions, sometimes just stubs, of a few articles: George Wagner, Haystack Calhoun, Paul Edward Anderson, but the Wikipedia has gotten too...formal...for casual me. I'm not complaining, it was bound to happen. Oh, about George Wagner, I've tried and tried to find out on the internet about the guy who was supposed to have been his inspiration, Lord Patrick Lansdowne, and there's hardly a mention of him. Too bad, I'm really kinda curious about him.

Fair enough well creating stubs is ok and i have posted a request for it... i cant find much either only breif references to him as part of George articles --- Paulley 16:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:JB196

In some cases, he does have a valid complaint - some of the more succinct articles are basically copy-and-pastes from OWW. Crediting a particular person within an article isn't really appropriate, though - adding a link to OWW under references should suffice in most cases. McPhail 17:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:JB196 reply

Hey Paulley, I got your message, but am new to wikipedia and can't figure out to reply. I went to your talk page but unlike with other talk pages I've been on there's not an option for New Topic so I don't know how to respond. E-mail me if you want. Thanks.

Dudue, your reply makes no sense..."due to the fact its nothing like the stuff you left on my userpage" - no idea what you mean by that..."Because i looked up all the moves from a variaty of other sources webpages, match reports, and by watching TWC) due to OWW not being much help in this respect.." - what is your point???? The pages i edited were pages where the move lists were straight from MY move list which it took me over 3 years to compile. - JB196

"wait i know where i have seen that list before... that was part of the finishing and signature move page of http://robbo.oeck.net/Stuff/ROH.html (back when it was online in 2005)" - Hey, Genius, that page WAS my work, and I gave the guy permission to print it? Why? Because he was a friend of mine from Thesmartmarks.com and I wanted him to host all my move lists. The ROH one was not the only one he hosted on that site; he also hosted the CZW, XPW, NJPW, WWE, TNA, etc. etc. etc. all my other move lists, too. This point of yours holds no validity.

You said: i used more than one reference (meaning your list) to compile the information on that page

What page? How do I know you made whatever page you're referring to and someone else didn't make it?

You said: after making update after update

For what profile?

You said: but that doesnt by any means give blah blah blah

What is "that"? You're not conveying your message very well. I don't know what you're referring to with any of this.

And I am not "Vandalizing" any page. I am simply trying to take the credit that I earned and deserve. No information is being removed from the articles.

JB1986: The B-Boy page doesn't have a link for OWW. Put one in or we're gonna keep going back and forth editing it.

Ashley's signature moves

It has come to my attention that you have been deleting Ashley's signature moves, although Ashley is not that much of an accomplished wrestler she has got a few signature moves that she has used on a number of occasions and even to win matches that are televised. For example if I can remember correctly, Ashley has used the magistral pin in almost every match she has wrestled in the WWE, aswell as clothesline varations. Deleting Ashley's moves and saying that they are not signature moves, is the same as deleting Stratus' Spinebuster, or Victory Roll, becasue she doesn't use them to finish matches. If that is the case, we should go on every wrestler's profile and delete every move that is not used to finish matches because they are not "signature". You can contact me on my talk page, to further discuss the issue. Thanks. (Fr3nZi3 19:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I agree with you on most of what you said, but I also think that the Crucifix roll up should remain and the Springboard into a double axe handle should remain, becuase she uses those frequently aswell. Every thing else can go e.g-- like the generic "Double Clothesline".

I'm sure she will be training to get better, but from the tag team matches she was in weekly, you could see that she was developing a repetoire of moves. From her Royal Rumble match with Mickie James, you could see that she has come leaps and bounds from her first matches with Victoria and Torrie! Give it a few months and she'll be the new WWE Women's Champion! (Fr3nZi3 19:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Molly Holly is good but the thing is we need to have the Smackdown Divas compete for the Women's Championship aswell! I still belive that Melina is still the most dominant Diva in the WWE and the best female wrestler-- much better than the stale Trish with the same moveset! If she is to get another title shot I guarantee that she'll be the new Women's Champion. She will bring back class to the belt! (Fr3nZi3 19:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Yes your'e right about Jillian Hall! Jillian is an 11-time Women's Champion is the Indy Circuit! She definately needs to go to RAW, and that is probably why JBL fired her. If you notice the WWE have taken everything away that might hinder he from getting more involved in the ring: "the mole" and her managing JBL-- she is ready to be drafted! By the way when is the draft lottery? Back to Melina-- she has more wrestling talent than most Divas, as I have watched her in the Indy promotions and she is on point!! She needs to start using the KyraPractor again, and her new finisher the Spinning facebuster adds a great touch to her arsenal of offensive moves. (Fr3nZi3 21:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Smackdown are the B show and I think that MNM have outgrown it! (Fr3nZi3 18:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Yeah putting them on Smackdown was just to give them some exposure! (Fr3nZi3 22:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

The draft lotto needs to happen sooner rather than later! (Fr3nZi3 05:55, 29 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Hi

Hi Paulley,

Just to let you know I would be more than happy to help you out by adding information on Northern wrestlers; I am planning on adding more articles of stars from promotions such as Wrestle Zone Wrestling (wZw) and 3 Count Wrestling (3CW).

Anyway, I would like to discuss things further with you and would appreciate it if you add me on MSN Messenger, my address is martin@mcbstudios.co.uk.

Looking forward to hearing from you,

Martin