User talk:Pauline Malette

April 2020

Hello, I'm Sek-2. Your recent edit(s) to the page Windows Server 2012 R2 appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sek-2 (talk) 08:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Windows Server 2008 R2. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sek-2 (talk) 10:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Internet Explorer 8, you may be blocked from editing. Sek-2 (talk) 10:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Internet Explorer 10. Sek-2 (talk) 10:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Windows 10, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Amkgp (talk) 18:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Windows 95 into Windows 3.1x. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at James Hetfield, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 15:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very eager for an explanation for your edits regarding Justin Bieber and Mastodon (band). Perhaps a good source? If it was vandalism, please have a look at the standard offer. If there is no good source, you should agree to a topic ban from editing biographies of living persons in the future, at the very least. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]