User talk:Paulbalegend
Lakes of the Clouds
[edit]Thanks for uploading your image of Lakes of the Clouds! It's quite beautiful. – Quadell (talk) (random) 16:27, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Franconia Range
[edit]Hi, Thanks for putting up the Franconia Ridge article. It's been needed for a long time. Could you provide some back-up, however, on your statement that Franconia Ridge is different from the Franconia Range? I've always seen them used interchangeably. The Board on Geographic Names, for instance, doesn't even have "Franconia Range" listed, except for a completely different range down near Keene, New Hampshire. If you have some reliable sources that show where else the Franconia Range goes besides the Ridge (perhaps over to Garfield?), could you then convert the Franconia Range page from a redirect to an actual article and explain the difference? Thanks, --Ken Gallager (talk) 19:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hello again. I guess not Garfield. I finally pulled out my copy of the AMC White Mountain Guide (26th ed., 1998) and looked through the chapter on the Franconia, Twin, and Willey Ranges. The "Geography" section talks about the Franconia and Twin Ranges forming a ring around the western half of the Pemigewasset Wilderness, then on page 141 describes the summits in the Franconia Range, mentioning all the major ones in the Wikipedia article, plus the auxiliary peaks such as Eagle Cliff and Coolidge Mountain. At the bottom of page 141, the guide says, "The Twin Range is connected to the Franconia Range by Garfield Ridge", which sounds pretty clearly to me that Garfield is not considered part of the Franconia Range. I suppose you could make a case that the lesser peaks such as Eagle Cliff and Coolidge are "Range" and not "Ridge", but you could just as easily say they're simply side peaks and that the Ridge and the Range are essentially synonymous. Do you have any other sources that indicate a difference? --Ken Gallager (talk) 23:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Saddleroute.JPG
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Saddleroute.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC
NowCommons: File:Mount Adams from Madison.JPG
[edit]File:Mount Adams from Madison.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Mount Adams NH from Madison.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Mount Adams NH from Madison.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Alpine Zone / Alpine zone redirect problem
[edit]Hi. I posted to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ecology#Alpine_Zone_.2F_Alpine_zone:_Bad_redirects_need_fix:
Alpine Zone redirects to Tundra.
Alpine zone redirects to Alpine climate.IMHO this is seriously broken behavior. Both of these should redirect to the same article (or we should have a standalone article on this topic.)
It might be a good idea to merge some existing content from these articles.
I'm contacting people who apparently worked on these. Would greatly appreciate your thoughts at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ecology#Alpine_Zone_.2F_Alpine_zone:_Bad_redirects_need_fix.
Thanks. -- Writtenonsand (talk) 21:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Saddleroute.JPG missing description details
[edit]If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Thank you for the photos
[edit]Your photos are beautiful. I'm late reporting this but I want to tell you that I uploaded some of your Commons photos of the White Mountains to my Wikipedia page. New Hampshire is one of my favorite places--I head there at least once a year and sometimes two or three times a year. I like to look out at the mountains, even if I can't be there and have to rely on photographs. Of course, nothing beats hiking in the Whites.Iss246 (talk) 15:01, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Equalized anchor.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
