User talk:Paulalex19

Speedy deletion of Type-7 particle weapon

A tag has been placed on Type-7 particle weapon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Macy (talk) 21:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Type-7 particle weapon

I have nominated Type-7 particle weapon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Type-7 particle weapon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 21:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Paul neyman

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Paul neyman, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Megakid Studios has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Megakid studios

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Megakid studios, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cunard (talk)

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page such as Megakid studios, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Megakid studios

A tag has been placed on Megakid studios requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NeoNerd 22:33, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decided to move the discussion here. Do you have any reliable third party sources that show the company to be notable? If so, add them. A the moment, there is nothing o indicate that the article is important enough to stay. The probable reason that previous contributions were marked as advertising is this: they were written like promotion for the company and not impartially.--NeoNerd 22:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Sierra Forums shows information and help I had with this, and youtube shows the Mod in the BETA stage. When I simply put that they are developing a mod for F.E.A.R. that hasn't been titled yet, it marked me with advertising. Paulalex19 (talk) 22:50, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forums and youtube are not reliable sources, I'm afraid, basically because anyone can add to them. If I put a video of myself on Youtube, that doesn't make me notable.--NeoNerd 22:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have a point there, however certain developements that originated on youtube and forums have gotten very far, and are known for just their existence. that's pretty much all megakid studios is doing. Paulalex19 (talk) 22:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and what exactly is the sandbox? Paulalex19 (talk) 23:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, fine, I will not post anymore information on Megakid Studios until they have released the mod and it is known well. I have simply attempted to show what Megakid Studios is and provide info on an unreleased video game (plenty of articles like that). Well until they finish I guess I have no other articles to write. Adios. Paulalex19 (talk) 23:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sandbox, to answer your question, is a page which you can change to pretty much anything, as long as it isn't offensive. You can find it here.--NeoNerd 00:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Blocked for continuing to repost Megakid studios despite above warnings. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of F.E.A.R. Mods

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of F.E.A.R. Mods, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Stifle (talk) 23:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Can you review my article on F.E.A.R.: List of F.E.A.R. Mods?Paulalex19 (talk) 23:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try Wikipedia:Peer review. Stifle (talk) 23:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of F.E.A.R. Mods

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of F.E.A.R. Mods, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of F.E.A.R. Mods. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Stifle (talk) 23:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]