User talk:Paul oneill

Hello !!

Sandyford Cricket Club

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sandyford Cricket Club, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Sandyford Cricket Club. B. Wolterding (talk) 13:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

File:Scc logo.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scc logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Sandyfordcc logo.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sandyfordcc logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dukes and Lee (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dukes and Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dukes and Lee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Paul oneill! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 00:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dukes and Lee (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dukes and Lee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dukes and Lee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 10:16, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dukes and Lee has been accepted

Dukes and Lee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 22:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Dukesandlee.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dukesandlee.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to resolve this issues with this file. Unfortunately, what you added to the file's page isn't really considered to be a non-free use rationale for Wikipedia's purposes, and this is why the file was removed from Dukes and Lee by a WP:BOT earlier today. The template you added ({{Non-free media data}}) is more of general information template that describes the provenance of the file, but doesn't explain how it's non-free use satisfies Wikipedia's non-free content use criteria. If you're going to use the "Non-free media data" template to describe where the image comes from, your also going to need to add {{Non-free media rationale}} to explain how the file's non-free use satisfies Wikipedia policy. So, the two templates are a set that pretty much need to be used together. There are other non-free use rationale templates that might work and many of these are both combination data/usage templates (i.e. two for the price of one type of templates). You can find some examples of these here. You also can write out a rationale manually as explained here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sandyfordcc logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Sandyfordcc logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Dukesandleecabaret.jpg

Hi Paul oneill. This file was also removed from Dukes and Lee by a bot for not having a non-free use rationale for the same reasons given above. So, you're going to need to add a non-free use rationale to the file's page in order to use it in the article. However, unlike the File:Dukesandlee.jpg that was being used in the main infobox of the article, the non-free use of this program cover looks pretty hard (almost impossible) to justify in the article and is likely going to be considered WP:DECORATIVE non-free use. If there existed a separate stand-alone Wikipedia article about this particular performance, the program cover could possibly be used there; however, its use in the Dukes and Lee article is likely going to require that there be sourced critical commentary specifically related to it (not the Behans performances, but the program cover itself) for the non-free use to be consider compliant as explained here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dukesandleecabaret.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dukesandleecabaret.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Dukesandleecabaret.jpg

The file File:Dukesandleecabaret.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in Dukes and Lee#Personal life which fails WP:NFCC#8. A non-free image is already being used for primary identification purposes in the article; so, two files aren't needed for that purpose per WP:NFCC#3a. Although the program cover could be the one for the Behans performances that Dukes and Lee were doing when Dukes died, there's no contextual connection between the cover and any other content other than that and the fact the Dukes died while performing doesn't require that the reader see the program cover itself to be understood per WP:NFC#CS. In order to justify this file's use in the article, it's likely going to require that there be sourced critical commentary specifically related to the program cover (not just the Behans performances, but the actual program cover itself) for the non-free use to be consider compliant as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3. If there existed a separate stand-alone Wikipedia article about this particular performance, the program cover could possibly be kept and used there, but no such article exist and the non-free use of the program cover in the biography article about doesn't satisfy relevant policy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Dukesandleecabaret.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dukesandleecabaret.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:54, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ronnie Dukes

Hello, Paul oneill. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ronnie Dukes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Phil O'Brien (cyclist) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Phil O'Brien (cyclist). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 12:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)