User talk:Patro-claus

Welcome!

Hello, Patro-claus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tanaza, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tanaza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tanaza, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC) I'll[reply]

Tanaza

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Your references were all to the company itself, obviously not neutral or adequate to establish notability. Also, there are no verifiable figures about the company's staffing, profits, turnover etc. Could be one person for all we are told.
It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. There was very little about the company, just what it was selling. Most of the claims made for the product lacked independent sources.
If you recreate, also make sure you don't copy text from a website unless it states clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation.

I'll shortly post the deleted text here Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's obviously better than it was, but my feeling is that there is still too little about the company that is the subject of the article. All we know is that it's in Milan. As long as the article is all about the product, I think it's a candidate for speedy deletion. The two messages following yours on my talk had a similar problem. One was supposed to be a biography, actually advertising the editor's book, the second was a software article just telling us how wonderful it was. Now, yours has references and a bit of history, but it still concentrates on what is being sold too much Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To my mind there is still not enough about the company itself. I'm on holiday from Wednesday, why don't you repost it then? I think it might survive, and if it doesn't, at least it won't be me swinging the axe (: Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:22, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tanaza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanaza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanaza until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edcolins (talk) 19:38, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]