User talk:Patrizia1961

August 2016

The article The deMon2k Program appeared to be an attempt to publicise or promote its subject, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy, and so it has been deleted. I also advise you that before you create any more articles, you have a look at Wikipedia's notability guidelines, as it is not clear to me that the deMon2k Program satisfies those guidelines, and if it doesn't then any article about it, no matter how it may be written, is likely to be deleted, meaning that any work put into it will be wasted. I also see that an article on the same subject has been deleted from Spanish Wikipedia, but I have no way of knowing whether you created that one too. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:43, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

The deMon2k Program is a Computational Chemistry Software. Following your advice how can I include the entry deMon2k in the list of Computational Chemistry Program under the Category: Computational chemistry software in the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computational_chemistry_software ? Would it be possible to recover the article which has been deleted in order to read it as a link once the deMon2k has been listed in the Computational Chemistry Program list? Many thanks for all your help. Patrizia1961 (talk) 16:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply To User:JamesBWatson

Hi James: The deMon2k Program is a Computational Chemistry Software. Following your advice how can I include the entry deMon2k in the list of Computational Chemistry Program under the Category: Computational chemistry software in the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computational_chemistry_software ? Would it be possible to recover the article which has been deleted in order to read it as a link once the deMon2k has been listed in the Computational Chemistry Program list? Many thanks for all your help.

Patrizia1961 (talk) 20:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply To User:JamesBWatson

Hi James: The deMon2k Program is a Computational Chemistry Software. Following your advice how can I include the entry deMon2k in the list of Computational Chemistry Program under the Category: Computational chemistry software in the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computational_chemistry_software ? Would it be possible to recover the article which has been deleted in order to read it as a link once the deMon2k has been listed in the Computational Chemistry Program list? Many thanks for all your help. Patrizia1961 (talk) 23:30, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Topic: The deMon2k Program

Hi James: The deMon2k Program is a Computational Chemistry Software. Details can be found at http://demon-software.com/public_html/index.html I would like to include it in the list of Computational Chemistry Program where many other computational chemistry programs are listed. Time ago I have created this page as a new article and it has been deleted by you. I am new in Wikipedia and I would like to ask for your help. Following your advice, how the entry deMon2k could be included in the list of Computational Chemistry Program under the Category: Computational chemistry software in the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computational_chemistry_software ? Many thanks in advance for all your help.

Patrizia1961 (talk) 23:48, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 27 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothyjosephwood was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Patrizia1961/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TimothyJosephWood 18:27, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Patrizia1961, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TimothyJosephWood 18:27, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DeMon2k (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DeMon2k and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades^Godric 13:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DeMon2k concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:DeMon2k, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]