User talk:Patriot Missile33

Welcome!

Hello, Patriot Missile33, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Chillum 14:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --> --> Bytebear (talk) 20:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please cease edit warring on Juice Plus. If you continue to arbitrarily delete content while ignoring the opinions of other editors on the talk page, you may be blocked. This is your second warning. Rhode Island Red (talk) 02:04, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --> --> Rhode Island Red (talk) 04:07, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have now been reported to Wikipedia administration for edit warring on the Juice Plus page. Rhode Island Red (talk) 16:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --> --> UltraEdit (talk) 06:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may have violated WP:BLP at Fellowship of Friends

Hello Patriot Missile33. Please be aware this this edit puts you in very deep water. Your edit included the Fellowship was accused of severe misconduct possibly including “financial, tax and immigration fraud, and perhaps other illegal activities and/or tortuous conduct”. The Wikileaks web site, since anyone may submit material to it without any vetting, is clearly not a WP:Reliable source. I hope you don't consider this an open question or needing much discussion. The letter to which you link alleges crimes by specific individuals. (I admit that your own text only suggests misconduct of the *organization* and not a specific person). Admins may take action if you restore this material yet again. If any outside source, for example a newspaper, has commented on the leaked letter from the former FoF lawyer you could cite what the newspaper said. EdJohnston (talk) 19:15, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:AN3 case about Fellowship of Friends has been closed with a warning to you. If you continue to restore the Wikileaks reference you may be blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 14:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by MuZemike 19:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.