User talk:PatriotAmerica2019
May 2019
[edit]
Hello, I'm Ifnord. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Trump Organization without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 16:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Trump Organization
[edit]This information is listed twice. There is a tab for financial disputes. This Wikipedia shows that the editors have a political bias.
Listed Under Trump Organization
Since both the financial statements of the Trump Organization's holdings and Donald Trump's personal tax returns are private, there exists a wide range of estimates of the Trump Organization's true value. On several occasions, Donald Trump has been accused of deliberately inflating the valuation of Trump Organization properties through aggressive lobbying of the media (in particular the authors of the annual Forbes 400 list) to bolster his perceived net worth.[12] He has released little definitive financial documentation to the public to confirm his valuation claims.[13][14]
Listed Again under Valuation Disputes
The financial statements of the Trump Organization's holdings are private, as are Donald Trump's personal tax returns, and there exist a wide range of estimates of the Trump Organization's true value. Donald Trump has been accused on several occasions of deliberately inflating the valuation of Trump Organization properties through the aggressive lobbying of the media, in particular the authors of the annual Forbes 400 list, in order to bolster his perceived net worth among the public over several decades.[12] He has released little definitive financial documentation to the public confirm his valuation claims.[13][14][161][162] PatriotAmerica2019 (talk) 17:12, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
May 2019
[edit]
Your recent editing history at The Trump Organization shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 17:38, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
I did not remove the same information, although it may appear that way the information is listed twice. I tried to remove it from one location (financial disputes) and they reverted it. I tried to remove it from another location (main) and they reverted it. At this point it would appear people are deliberately preventing accuracy because they would rather repeat derogatory information multiple times. I find it interesting that financial disputes and controversy have their own separate tabs. Is a financial dispute not a controversy?
Definition of controversy
1 : a discussion marked especially by the expression of opposing views : DISPUTE
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/controversy
con·tro·ver·sy (kŏn′trə-vûr′sē)
n. pl. con·tro·ver·sies
1. A dispute, especially a public one, between sides holding opposing views.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/controversy
So you have a dispute tab, and you have a controversy tab. You have information listed under the dispute tab that is also listed at the top of the page, and you have three different “editors” continuously fighting to neglect an inaccurate Wikipedia page associated with a key political figure, the President of the United States of America.
- The problem here is not regarding the substance of the edit; it is that the page's content constantly flipping between two versions is considered disruptive to Wikipedia's readers. Opening a discussion on Talk:Trump Organization is the correct thing to do here, so thank you for doing that, but please do not remove the content from the main article again until the discussion on the talk page has concluded. Thank you. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:20, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
PatriotAmerica2019, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi PatriotAmerica2019! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC) |