User talk:Passion4purple1995

sup girl

Thank you for experimenting with the page Wine on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- The Bethling ^(Talk) 06:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Maybe you could stop with your useless edits and vandalizing? If you want to contribute, then do it serious, or don't do it all. Continue add nonsense content and you might get blocked from editing. -- Frap 17:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sandboxes

There is no need to create additional sandbox pages (such as Sandbox 1 and Sandbox 2) - there is already Wikipedia:Sandbox for general-purpose edits, as well as 5 specific-purpose sandboxes and 9 test templates. If Wikipedia:Sandbox happens to lose its header text, it's simple enough to readd it by looking at the edit history (or simply viewing a revision containing it and then clicking the "Click here to reset the sandbox." link). --Quietust 13:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please don't create test pages in article space. If you need additional pages for experimentation (and Wikipedia:Sandbox and related pages are not enough for you), create them as your user subpages, such as User:Passion4purple1995/sandbox. - Mike Rosoft 08:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

I went to the sandbox to do some testing and some one had deleted all of the tutorials in exchange for some nasty words and I wanted to help. Sorry if I messed up, you can delete them. Thank you for your time Awsome Samantha the **STAR**. 13:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Vania R, to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bonadea 10:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Vania R, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Vania R, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for 24 hours for repeated recreation of inappropriate pages. Please consider contributing positively to Wikipedia when the block expires. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Passion4purple1995 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That was a real story book that real people wanted to know about geez I deserve another shot

Decline reason:

You will have another shot once your block expires. But if you recreate deleted articles such as Vania R that are not on notable subjects (see WP:NOTE), you will almost certainly be blocked indefinitely. Wikipedia is not to be used for articles like that, see WP:NOT. — Yamla 15:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The book Vania R may well exist, but your article contained no information at all and was rightfully speedily deleted. You could have started "Vania R is a book written by ..." and then given information about its plot and perhaps an amazon.com link. Please see the manual of style and notability guidelines before you try to re-create the page. - Mike Rosoft 08:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Try re-creating it in your user space (such as User:Passion4purple1995/Vania R); if it is approved, it will be moved to article space. - Mike Rosoft 08:46, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The International School of Azerbaijan

Thank you for starting the article The International School of Azerbaijan! As a Wikipedia contributor you must be prepared for other people editing "your" articles, however. This is a collaborative project, which means that everybody is free to edit almost any article, as long as it is done within the guidelines. --Bonadea 10:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The International School of Azerbaijan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The International School of Azerbaijan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. kashmiri (talk) 12:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]