User talk:Passion4Process

Welcome!

Hello, Passion4Process! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 07:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Ways to improve Low-code development platforms

Hi, I'm Eyesnore. Passion4Process, thanks for creating Low-code development platforms!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Should you come up with a lead section for this article?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Eye snore 19:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Appian Corporation (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Appian Corporation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 11:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Passion4Process, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 11:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Appian Corporation has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Appian Corporation. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 17:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC Review Accepted

Hi,

I just reviewed your article on Appian Corporation and passed it, due to the additional sources since the last review. I deemed it slightly marginal, and thus not entirely safe from either passing New Page Review or just being submitted to Articles for Deletion. I did some regular tidying up, as well as some extra linking to it, but it could probably use one more good source like Wired's or the WashingtonPost - a key thing to remember is that sources talking about IPOs, or new headquarters, aren't usually accepted as adding to article notability.

In any case, thanks for preserving through the multiple reviews - the military usage news article was an interesting read too Nosebagbear (talk) 19:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Appian Corporation

Hello, Passion4Process,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Appian Corporation should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appian Corporation .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

SamHolt6 (talk) 23:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]