User talk:Pascack

Reggie Jackson page, voting, etc.

I see that an anonymous IP recently added several faux votes to the Reggie Jackson article, which quite coincidentally happened to be the same position you hold. I also see that you voted with both your IP, which you used to evade your two week block, and this account. I would hate to have to perform another checkuser for continuing to sockpuppet against the rules. And I guarantee that the community - myself included, will be far less conciliatory about a long term block than we were on the last occasion. So please, let's hope there are no more anonymous IPs voting anywhere or engaging in edit warring with your point of view - I'm sure you could help me out with that by removing the said votes yourself, should you see them. Thanks. The Evil Spartan 17:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Packs.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Packs.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gold Dust Trio for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gold Dust Trio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Dust Trio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 22:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]