User talk:Parys

why did you revert that page

Talk:Mandy_Moore#Not_a_great_deal_to_discuss. --Kurt Shaped Box 22:15, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First off, that has nothing to do with removing sourced info just because a fan doesn't like it. All i added was info that anyone can check out with google in seconds. Parys 22:17, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have provided the source for that image - but not the copyright status. You also originally (falsely) tagged the image as a magazine cover in an attempt to pass it off as fair use. You cannot simply take any image you find online, upload it to Wikipedia and use it in an article without first justifying your reasons for doing so on the image's description page. Also see WP:IUP. --Kurt Shaped Box 22:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Inmypocket.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Inmypocket.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo.

Categorizing WIkipedians

Category:Multiracial Americans is a category for articles in the Main space, not User space. WP does not allow this. -User:Carie

Hello I recently read the book The Color of Silence. I was wondering are you, or are you affiliated with Parys Sylver?

Firegirl223

Mandy Moore

The official RIAA site that records numbers on platinum and gold albums says the only platinum album she has is So Real. Her secord and third went Gold and Coverage isn't listed at all. RIAA's site is official, NNDB is not. And We've gone other this on the "criticism." Linking to one person does not make it noteworthy. I have an idea. Why not get 2 or 3 more reviews that say the same thing, then you can re-add the criticism part. Do what you did on the Metacritic link. And if you do re-add the it, don't revert the whole article like you just did, please. You reverted alot of good edits. Crumbsucker 22:52, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And as I said before, re-add it with links to these major sites. And when you do, as I said above, don't total total revert the article, just re-add you piece you want. I changed the article's headings and layout, and reverting it wrecks it. BTW, don't make any assumtion about me, please. I've actually never bought any of Mandy Moore's music. I've edited several pages of people who I am only minimally interested in. I just prefer accuracy, is all. BTW, your comparision to Michael's molestation cases are laughable to say the least. Crumbsucker 22:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, give links to these sites. I welcome them. Crumbsucker 23:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Trevorblumas1.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Trevorblumas1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kurt Shaped Box 21:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ff2005 jimmy wayne.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ff2005 jimmy wayne.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kurt Shaped Box 22:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of the images you have uploaded are unsourced....

Please check back over the images you have uploaded over the past few months[1] - none of them state where the image originated from. I have tagged them as unsourced and they will be deleted in seven days time unless you can provide the nescessary info. Thanks. --Kurt Shaped Box 22:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:AaliyahOneInAMillionsingle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AaliyahOneInAMillionsingle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Amel_bravebird_th.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Amel_bravebird_th.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Bestofmandymoore.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bestofmandymoore.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:333.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:333.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 20:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cry.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Mandy Moore Live@ShoutBack

An editor has nominated the article Mandy Moore Live@ShoutBack for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandy Moore Live@ShoutBack. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Mandy Moore Live@ShoutBack during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extraordinary

I do have reason. That photo is from 2005. She released the new photoshoot last week. It is totally fake and fanmade. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Musicfreak7676 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Well, I don't know how to sign my posts or else I would. And also, it is fake. Mandy released the album's photoshoot. Plus the blonde pictures are from 2005. I, in no way wanna start trouble but I know for a fact that the cover is not real. ~Musicfreak7676

They state MooreOfMandy.Com because it's the official fansite. The owner was asked if she wanted it to become the official fansite from The Firm. Why they are using a 2005 photoshoot is beyond my mind too. Also, [off topic], are you relating me to a stalker on the Mandy article for the single? ~Musicfreak7676

There is a such thing as Official Fansite. If there wasn't, everyone would say official. It wasn't official until December or so. It is truely true. "21:04, 14 February 2007 Parys (Talk | contribs) (Vandalism in progess the remix. this reminds me of that stalker UCLA chick) " You said it reminded you of a stalker so it leads me to believe I'm a stalker? I don't mean to cause trouble at all though. ~Musicfreak7676

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Oohitskindacrazy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Oohitskindacrazy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extraordinary

I've restored the redirect I placed on the Extraordinary article. There are no sources in the article that support the assertion that it will be released as a single. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - we can't include unreferenced and unverifiable speculation, which includes claiming that because a song is featured on a singer's MySpace page, it will be released as a single. Please cite a reliable source that confirms the release of this song as a single. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 19:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, a song is not "officially getting airplay" when it is featured on an artist's MySpace page; where did you get that idea? The song is getting radio play? Where? It doesn't appear on this Mediabase chart. The promo cover could easily be a fake (the text looks very much like an MS Paint job to me). You still haven't provided any source, much less a reliable one, that supports your claim that the song has been released as a single, so I've nominated the article for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extraordinary. Again, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Extraordinary Machine 15:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I CAN in fact, verify that Extraordinary IS Mandy Moore's first single from Wild Hope. I have the promo single for the song, along with the press kit. It is on the myspace page as an early promotional deal to strike interest. But yes, it is her first single. Jj1973 02:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)JJ[reply]

Extraordinary

An article that you created, Extraordinary, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extraordinary Thank you. SkierRMH 20:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soul Decision

Please provide information where you got the information about the new soul decision greatest hits and album cover. There is no information about this anywhere on the internet.

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Covers.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Covers.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Nothingthatur.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nothingthatur.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Nothingthur.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nothingthur.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:11, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: You cant stand that i was right

Firstly, do not make personal attacks on other editors. Secondly, the IP editors who were persistently re-creating the article did not, contrary to your claim, provide "verified proff [sic] that nothing that you are is the next single". If removing unsourced and speculatory content from articles constitutes "officially making an ass out of myself", perhaps you should tell that to everybody at Wikipedia talk:Verifiability — verifiability is official policy and I don't see why you should be allowed to ignore it, simply because you can't be bothered to find sources or don't care about policy. We have some outstandingly well-referenced articles about some highly significant and controversial subjects and they cite all their sources, so if you're serious about contributing to Wikipedia you need to accept this is policy, and either cite your sources or move on. If you don't cite your sources, other editors will eventually remove the content you inserted or, if they think it's useful enough, try to cite sources themselves. If you care about the Nothing That You Are article and don't want to create extra work for other editors down the line, perhaps you should be the one to do the citing and your contributions might have some chance of staying. Extraordinary Machine 14:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should know that the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth — as another user told you at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nothing That You Are, crystal ballery, even if it eventually ends up coming true, is still crystal ballery, and does not belong on Wikipedia until it is verifiable in reliable sources. You were asked to provide such sources and you didn't do so. I wasn't sure I was right in thinking that neither song would be released as a single, because I didn't think that (contrary to your claims) — I was right in thinking that unsourced claims about future single releases and whatnot should be removed, and you'll be hard-pressed to find many editors in good standing who disagree with this.

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 12:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parys, you were told at user talk:131.183.235.59 that it is bad form to revert other editors wholesale without any explanation or discussion. You recent blanket revert at the Nothing That You Are article involved not only restoring the unsourced/outdated information and original research (the two links you added to the article don't even mention the song, much less support what you re-added to the article about it), but undoing my spelling, grammar, wikilink and formatting corrections, bringing of the article into line with the Manual of Style, and addition of a reference. This is disruptive and completely unacceptable, and if you continue this behaviour, you will be blocked from editing for a period. Extraordinary Machine 13:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've reverted wholesale again, reintroducing content that violates Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Case in point: you can't make statements such as "The song is about a woman discover of her boyfriends infidelities" without providing a reliable source to support it. I took the time to incorporate your helpful addition of a reliable source into the article rather than undo everything; I'd advise you strongly if you read the relevant policy and guideline pages the next time you think about reverting someone who fixes problems with your edits. Finally, I do not have a "personal issue" against you or the article, and your claiming that I do does not excuse the article from conforming to the policies and guidelines. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 17:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, why are you simply reverting wholesale and without any explanation? Would you rather the article be out of line with the policies and guidelines, among other problems? Extraordinary Machine 23:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Otownalbum.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Otownalbum.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wizardman 19:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ooh065.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ooh065.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:28, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shoutback50.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shoutback50.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sdoikcsingle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sdoikcsingle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Onlyhopescreen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Onlyhopescreen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bestofmandymoore.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bestofmandymoore.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cry single.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cry single.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crush single.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Crush single.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MandyMoorecover17.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:MandyMoorecover17.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Slummincover.JPG}

Thank you for uploading Image:Slummincover.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:26, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Iwanna23.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Iwanna23.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Slummin In Paradise

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Slummin In Paradise, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 02:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Slummincover.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Slummincover.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC) --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 02:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Slummincover.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Slummincover.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Faded.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Faded.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kookee22 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 09:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Parys! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 70 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Trevor Guthrie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Onlyhope.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Onlyhope.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 17 (Mandy Moore song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 17 (Mandy Moore song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/17 (Mandy Moore song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Novice7 (talk) 14:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Faded (soulDecision song) coverart.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Faded (soulDecision song) coverart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:05, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Parys

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Parys, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Stale unfiled RfAs and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Parys during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]