User talk:Parveson
Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in Balanced scorecard. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links as long as the content abides by our policies and guidelines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --AbsolutDan (talk) 01:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hello - in response to your message on my talk page, the "References" section is intended for sources of information that were/are used to write the article. Furthermore, the link in question dumps the reader off to a commercial offering at the end of the page, which is generally frowned upon here. I hope this explains the reason for my removal of the link. --AbsolutDan (talk) 02:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Efficiency
[edit]Hello. Thanks for your comment on Talk:Efficiency (statistics). I changed the text in the example. I hope you like it. By the way, please don't hesitate to change articles yourself if you think they can be improved. Also, please sign your comments on talk pages by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end of the post. --Zvika (talk) 07:43, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit] Hello Parveson! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 312 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- James M Houston - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:11, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
June 2011
[edit]
Your addition to Ra has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. In a addition, this was what we call original research - see WP:NOR as the book reerenced, or at least the page referenced, doesn't mention Ra. We also should not use words that suggest the biblical accounts were actual history Dougweller (talk) 20:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Solar cooker, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. These weren't minor edits [1] Dougweller (talk) 20:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
Fair use
[edit]How did you find that subpage? I don't think I even knew it existed. Anyway, fair use is a bit tricky. Read Wikipedia:Non-free content. One problem is that we have over three million articles, so a quote used many times raises the question of whether it is fair use. A short quote in an article, in quotation marks, with inline citation - see WP:CITE including page number, is fine. Several quotes from the same source, probably not. You also need to understand that we are pretty strict about paraphrase. See Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing - don't take the bit about it not being policy too seriously, close paraphrase gets deleted and editors who ignore it do it at their own risk. I'm not suggesting you would do that of course. If you have questions about specific edits please use my talk page, not that subpage which I think I'll delete. Dougweller (talk) 12:07, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Your personal assessment of the market is more than likely accurate. However, being your own view, not supported by any external sources, it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Owen× ☎ 17:50, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Parveson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Parveson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Presbyterian Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greystone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Parveson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Edits to History of climate change science
[edit]I read with interest your content re "greenhouse" terminology. However, the content seems to be two or three times as long as it should be, in the context of the entire history of climate change science. It reads like an essay, not encyclopedic content. I suggest you pare it down dramatically to state what the (mis)understanding is, and why it's a misunderstanding. Every "impact" of that misunderstanding is not really appropriate in that article. I hope this saves you some work. —RCraig09 (talk) 19:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, I will fix it soon. 100.15.105.24 (talk) 00:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]
Your edit to Greenhouse has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The quote was fine, the sentence before it not. Nobody (talk) 06:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greenhouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Clare. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hello Parveson! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |