User talk:Particleman24
|
Image copyright problem with Image:CSuper_Sprint.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:CSuper_Sprint.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
March 2008
[edit]Please do not add misinformation to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes. Each season of the show has 13 episodes. Until that episode aired, season 5 had only 12. There is no contract for a sixth season, and no current plans to produce one. Thank you. -- Elaich talk 21:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
[edit]
Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 15:12, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Talk: Ed Edd n Eddy. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed even if some believe it to be contentious. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. You also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. treelo talk 15:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. treelo talk 15:46, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Ed, Edd n Eddy
[edit]How many times do I have to tell YOU that if you have no proof other than rumors or self research that it does not fly on Wikipedia? The LAST confirmed statement we have on Season 6 is that it is postponed in lieu of making the movie. A bunch of fanboy rumor mongering on a fan site does not change that. There is also NO PROOF that the 2 episodes in question have ever aired ANYWHERE. They allegedly aired once in Australia, of which no proof can be found, and since have never aired anywhere. The fact they are on Youtube means nothing in this context, as they could have been (intentionally?) leaked. Give it up. Unless you can find written, verifiable proof that the 2 episodes aired (not from a fansite) AND that they are season 6 episodes, they remain in season 5, as it fits the past pattern perfectly. -- Elaich talk 18:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of YouTube poop
[edit]
A tag has been placed on YouTube poop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 20:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of YouTube poop
[edit]A tag has been placed on YouTube poop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 20:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of YouTube poop
[edit]A tag has been placed on YouTube poop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 20:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
User Warnings(s)
[edit] Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 20:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
YouTube Poop
[edit]Why did you delete this article? --Particleman24 (talk) 20:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Tagged par WP:NEO and WP:SOURCE. This sentence was in no way sourced as being important enough, and seems to be an unimportant neologism. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 20:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- No offense, but I didn't understand a word you just said. Second, I'm a YouTube Pooper myself. --Particleman24 (talk) 20:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- I guess i can't get away with a 1 line responce this time :). Now, for the longer version: For a subject to be on wikipedia, certain guidelines have to be met. The first one is WP:N, or notability. This rule states that an article must be important enough to warrant an encyclopedia article. The article you created, does not seem to be about a notable subject as there is no sourcing.
- Second, the article fails WP:NEO. The sentence "Youtube Pooper" is a new sentence that has only recently appeared. The first problems with neologisms is that Wikipedia is not a dictionary made to explain the meaning of a certain sentence. The second problem is that this neologism is not widely spread (IE: used by a lot of people, or at least the article doesn't indicate this) Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 20:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
[edit] If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ed, Edd n Eddy, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. YouTube Poop (and variants) have all been salted due their status as neologisms and non-notable. Please do not add information regarding youTube Poop and any animated series to any article or warnings will be issued due to the subject being of no note and also being a conflict of interest. Thank you. treelo talk 11:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think it's time to begin the vandalism warnings. This person has repeatedly demonstrated that he does not "get it": and has repeatedly gone against the will of the editing community. There is no good faith here, and there is certainly a long enough record of disruptive editing to proceeed. -- Elaich talk 13:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- I've had it with you people. I'm just going to leave for a long time. Goodbye! --Particleman24 (talk) 23:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Trust me sonny, the feeling is completely mutual. If you do come back from your extended break don't bother if you're just going to scatterspamming with your next failed meme. treelo talk 00:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- I've had it with you people. I'm just going to leave for a long time. Goodbye! --Particleman24 (talk) 23:19, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Considering your last explosion [1], [2], [3], and others which I won't point out, but I am sure you are aware of; I am going to ask that you talk on the WT:TOON page before you attempt to re-join the project. Yngvarr (c) 14:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- What exactly am I supposed to talk about on the talk page? --Particleman24 (talk) 11:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, for starters, I'd like to know if you understand why you were in conflict. Yngvarr (c) 11:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- You know the Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes "May I Have This Ed" and "Look Before You Ed"? Well, there's this ongoing argument about wether these episodes were in the 5th season or the 6th season. I thought they were in the 6th season. If you want to learn more, then ask Treelo or Elaich. --Particleman24 (talk) 23:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, for starters, I'd like to know if you understand why you were in conflict. Yngvarr (c) 11:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
[edit] Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Ed, Edd n Eddy. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Yeah, you struck the talkpage, not the article itself but I feel that your contributions when you do add to the talkpage only stand to further the opinions of those at The3Eds.com which are obviously biased and a bit out of touch. Keep the op-ed edits you make out of the talkpages as well as mainspace articles. treelo radda 19:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
EE&E talk page
[edit]Ok, let me try this without slapping a standard template on you... You comments to the EE&E talk page have been reverted twice, both because this really has nothing to do with the article. I'm know you are unhappy with Cartoon Network, but this is really not the place to discuss subjective opinions. If you are unhappy with them, write them a letter. If you know of any reliable sources which offers criticism, then bring them up on the talk page. I've linked the word criticism, in the hopes that you'll take time to review what criticism is, rather than just plain bashing, and why the 3eds, as a fan site is not suitable for critical analysis. This is turning into a perennial issue. Yngvarr (t) (c) 15:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
And...?
[edit]I'm on my last thread to posting a request for comment on your contributions. The EE&E things aside, not seeing the value to this addition. Is there an issue with that, or is it necessary to add this to the article? Cartoon Network owns the copyright, and the videos were copyright infringement. I'm getting a little thin on WP:AGF, but I won't revert you. I've tried to talk with you in the past, as have others, yet we get nowhere. Why is this? Yngvarr (t) (c) 23:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- I... don't know. But at least it'll warn some YouTube members about Cartoon Network. --Particleman24 (talk) 23:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- (ec)I do if you don't. You have a vendetta against Cartoon Network for not passing it by you and others like yourself changes in scheduling and the availability of shows you enjoy elsewhere. As such, you've taken to crying about it here, YouTube and anywhere else you feel people will agree with you. Those who disagree with you get a mouthful of abuse and general "you/wikipedia must hate (insert pet cause)" smokescreening. Personally, I feel what you do is tendentious editing at its finest, everything is to do with YouTube and/or the videos you and other people create "for teh lulz" and/or the big bad copyright owners taking away your videos and/or how badly Cartoon Network treats real fans of EEnE, anyway you cut it it's all POV pushing. If Yngvarr doesn't post a RFC, I will because it's getting tiresome and that you can't explain yourself is a weak defense for your actions. treelo radda 23:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- This is getting close to being a Wikipedia:Agenda account. You've repeatedly subjectively criticized Cartoon Network for their treatment of EE&E, pushing WP:NPOV contributions which aren't verifiable. This is not the forum to express your dissatisfaction with Cartoon Network, and this latest addition even more so. They (CN) are protecting their intellectual property. They're a for-profit company. Would you expect any less from any other organization? If you are unhappy with Cartoon Network, visit their web page, write them a letter. You're an active member at the 3eds. Over there, start a movement for fans to write letters. Try to contact Antonucci. He has a web site, write to him, see what he says/can do. Yngvarr (t) (c) 23:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
RFC
[edit]RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Particleman24)
[edit]Hello, Particleman24. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Particleman24, where you may want to participate. -- Yngvarr (t) (c) 15:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC) Yngvarr (t) (c) 15:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Particleman24 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Yngvarr (t) (c) 20:28, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Carla Franklin
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Carla Franklin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ~NerdyScienceDude 00:45, 21 October 2010 (UTC)