User talk:Parkerex

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Walkman, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 06:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Walkman. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Stop adding Balram Shotam to the Walkman page. The cited reference, UK patent #2064326, does not exist. You have no case for keeping this material in the article. Binksternet (talk) 00:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Walkman. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 12:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Walkman, you will be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:21, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The facts are on file with the British Government. Patent No. 1564326 COMBINED CASSETTE PLAYER AND HEAD PHONE SET issued by Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks. Patent Application filed by A.SPENCE & CO., Chartered Patent Agents, Surrey, UK.Parkerex (talk) 04:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This UK patent (UK 1564326) yields no results. Binksternet (talk) 15:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Walkman, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Walkman, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:30, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is a fact that Balram Shotam was the original inventor of the Transportable Combined Cassette Player and Head Phone Set, per British Patent GB1564326, filed in 1976. Reliable and verifiable citation is also provided. How can adding factual information be deemed as vandalism, disruptive editing, and as personal analysis?Parkerex (talk) 16:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Walkman. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:17, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There was a CONCENSUS (see Stattock 28 May 2007 and your comment 15 June 2009 reproduced below) that if someone can actually find the referenced patent GB1564326, then our edit should remain (note correct Patent# is GB1564326). So can you please reinstate our edit.

""Of course, if someone can actually find the referenced patent, by all means add it back in. Stattouk 01:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)"".

""If the UK patent #2064326 introduced as evidence by User:Parkerex were valid, then it would be available as a wiki cite in this manner: UK 2064326. What that cite returns is no results. Parkerex doesn't have a source that we can use. Binksternet (talk) 21:04, 15 June 2009 (UTC)"" Parkerex (talk) 07:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]