User talk:Pardocebu

Welcome!

Hello, Pardocebu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --seav (talk) 14:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding barangays

I have reverted your changes to Cebu's town's articles wherein you deemphasized barangays and instead used barrios or districts. These government units are officially called barangays. For example, the website of Sogod, Cebu uses the term barangays: [1]. --seav (talk) 14:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There all the same thing. The word barrio are commonly used in Cebu. User:Pardocebu

Do you have a source to back that assertion up? "Barangay" is the official administrative name for these local government units in English and linking to both barrio and barangay, which both talk about different things will confuse the reader. Please reconsider. --seav (talk) 02:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From a cebuano point of view Barangay and Barrio are the same thing. Cebuano in the other hand is different to Tagalog in terms of dialects. Cebuano is the other hand, count their numbers 1 to 10 both in Binisaya, and Spanish. The word kaibigan in Tagalog, stands for Amigo in Cebuano. I'm not being political here, but this how we used things here in cebu. -- User:Pardocebu 3:31, 6 January (UTC)

But I guess using a more general and commonly used term, rather than trying to emphasize your point of view, would be better. We here at Wikipedia discourage censorship or emphasis on a single group or entity so as to make things fair for everyone. Blake Gripling (talk) 04:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer you don't add "barrio" to the articles, it's just redundant. And do not replace the word "barangay" with "district", that is simply incorrect. TheCoffee (talk) 14:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it were true that barrio and barangay are synonyms in the Cebuano language, this is the English-language Wikipedia and the proper English term for these things is barangay and using barrio (in English) is imprecise. --seav (talk) 15:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is true. District should be used in English langauges instead of Barangay. It needs to be presented in a professional way. It is an encyclopedia. People from Manila have to may political issues in regards to many topics. And also the districts in cebu are "not politically divided". User:Pardocebu

Barangay is an English word. If there's an English equivalent of "barangay", it is village or community. –Howard the Duck 04:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "politically divided" is used in the context of political science and it means that these cities and municipalities, as political entities, are further subdivided into smaller entities, namely barangays. It does not mean that they are divided into warring political parties, if that's what you are referring to. If you want, you can use the phrase "administratively divided". But the proper term is still "barangay" and it's a valid English word that can be seen in various official documents (even Cebuano politicians and websites use the term). And bringing Manila to this discussion does not seem to be proper; this has nothing to do with Manila's political problems. --seav (talk) 07:09, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of acute accents

In general, for contemporary names, acute accents are not used. While these names may have Spanish origins, modern Philippine English usage is to omit most types of accents (except the tilde on 'N' in many names such as Osmeña and Parañaque). Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Philippine-related articles) for more information. --seav (talk) 11:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]