User talk:Paraster

Welcome

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Tiptoety ^talk 05:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dynasty. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tiptoety ^talk 05:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Dynasty. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 05:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paraster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was restoring the article from blatant vandalism, i was reverting changes that had blanked sourced information.

Decline reason:

The editors reverting you appear to have had a valid reason for doing so; this was a content dispute, not vandalism. When caught in a potential edit war, we ask both sides to discuss matters rather than disruptively revert each other. Since neither of you did, you're both blocked. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paraster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it was not a content dispute, the other editor had thrown thinly veiled insults in his explanations for reverts, and even said a curse word.

Decline reason:

It was a content dispute; the fact that the other editor was using inappropriate edit summaries is concerning, but you still responded and edit warred, hence the block. Sorry, but you'll have to sit this one out. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 05:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dynasty&diff=263746359&oldid=263746187 insult] curse word clearly not a dispute, rather insults

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paraster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i already tried discussing it with the other editor here, what i got was a couple more insults, uncluding the word masturbate. the editor was specifically warned not to insult anyone on that page again, [1] as you can see i mentioned the topic we were edit warring about, and the words "masturbate", peasant, and "reading comprehension" you need it, came up. I clrealy tried to talk and its impossible to talk with this user, as he already gotten a warning and continued to post insults on that page.

Decline reason:

any misbehaviour by other editors that may have occurred does not justify revert warring. See WP:DR and WP:EW for constructive solutions for disagreements. --fvw * 20:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paraster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

when kuebie was removing cited sections from the article, he did not try to talk at all, usually its the remover who places the comment on the talk page explaining why. and we talked over the same thing at that talk page and it was obvious that nothing was wrong with the source itself, it was that the user was a nationalist and is trying to treat wikipedia as a korean nationalist wikipedia

Decline reason:

Like every other request on this page, the above does not make any attempt to show that you intend to stop the edit war, nor does it in any way address your behavior. It only comments on the behavior of others, and as such, provides admins with no reason to unblock you. Since you have been denied 5 times at this point, I see no reason to allow you to continue to abuse the unblock process. This page will be protected, presently. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.