User talk:ParamountBricks271

October 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Castlevania (1986 video game) has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 20:08, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Universal Pictures Home Entertainment, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 21:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Castlevania, you may be blocked from editing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 06:00, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editing like this is considered disruptive. You were already reverted before. Please use the talk page next time. And if you don't want to use an edit summary, do not leave an incorrect one. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 06:03, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 14:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Castlevania, you may be blocked from editing. You have a verifiable history of disruptive editing. Please stop. It should not be up to other Wikipedians to clean up your mess. GSK (talk • edits) 16:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ParamountBricks271! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at List of films based on Hasbro properties‎ that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk/Contribs} 17:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COMMUNICATION is required. You seem to ignore every message. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 18:44, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Altering links

Hello. I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. Please stop "fixing" links. Read WP:NOTBROKEN. We don't need to link to the exact article title. Please stop going around changing it, it serves no purpose, and at times, can actually be detrimental. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 16:43, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:FarhanNaufal5 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FarhanNaufal5. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 19:17, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]