User talk:Parakeetman3905

February 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Brandy Norwood has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brandy Norwood was changed by Parakeetman3905 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92743 on 2019-02-11T12:03:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Craig Ferguson. David Biddulph (talk) 12:51, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:57, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Parakeetman3905 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was testing my edit skills so I can help undo vandalism sorry if I caused vandalism in the process Parakeetman3905 (talk) 13:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Second ban appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Parakeetman3905 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn’t really mean to cause distress Among Wikipedia I just wanted to see if I could revert vandalism but I guess all of the world/wiki thinks it’s bad to test before helping if you unblock me I promise I won’t vandalize anythingParakeetman3905 (talk) 01:34, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, you've clearly been through this process before, so let's skip the part where you get another appeal and go straight to the part where I remove your talk page access and send you to WP:UTRS. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also

If I make to many ban appeals I can’t edit this page either? Can I at least edit my OWN page!?!? Parakeetman3905 (talk) 01:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Parakeetman3905 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23925 was submitted on Feb 12, 2019 02:49:31. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Parakeetman3905 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23930 was submitted on Feb 12, 2019 12:01:22. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Standard offer request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Parakeetman3905 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been away for around a year since I got blocked and have wanted to get unblocked recently to change my page and help others and I understand that what I did a year ago was irresponsible and promise that I will never edit another page irresponsibly and will only correct what has been done wrong. The reason I got banned was because I irresponsibly deleted text to add later but got carried away. I will only edit pages in need of help and my own Tim (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As discussed below, this is not specific enough. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll just leave this here, from my reply to your UTRS request, seeing as you appear to have either not read it or not understood it...

But please be aware that just saying "I’ve followed the standard offer requirements" is not sufficient. I will reproduce, below, the Standard Offer instructions you were given in response to your previous UTRS request...

1. Wait six months without sockpuppetry. That means no editing the English Wikipedia, under this account or any other, for six months.

2. Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban. You must show us that you understand what went wrong and know how to keep it from happening again.
3. Don't create any extraordinary reasons for the Wikipedia community to object to a return.

Point 2 is the important one at this stage.

Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC) (Note to reviewer: I made this comment before the unblock request was updated.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As noted in small text above, an attempt to respond to these concerns has now been made in Special:Diff/950194087, which I personally still find to be pretty unprecise. Parakeetman3905, please provide examples for edits you would like to make: Which edit would you like to make, at which page? Please describe exactly how you would like to change the article(s). Additionally, please be more precise about the reasons that led to your block. At the moment, your unblock request does not contain any explanation of what has happened, why it has happened, and why we don't need to fear it happening again. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:24, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At this point I give up trying to get my account unbanned since it’s been nearly two years since the ban. No matter how many times I follow the guides the moderators give me they still just say I didn’t follow the unban guidelines so have a good November, Bye. Tim (talk) 17:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

jakohl account

You say you blocked it but it seems more like you deleted it Tim (talk) 18:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason I bring this up is because if I search for it I can’t find it and if I try to log into it it says the account doesn’t exist Tim (talk) 18:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I truly give up all hope for this site and any others like it, it is now over 2 years and I have explained what I did bur the Moderators think I'm lying even though I outlined what it was I did. I give up hope because at this point I have not only given up hope but don't care about this anymore. I was irresponsible and childish in school with my friends, I hope you can forgive me. Sincerely, Parakeetman3905/Tim 2601:249:B80:7840:95C0:998C:73A3:D59B (talk) 17:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]