User talk:Paragdighe

Welcome!

Hello, Paragdighe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Alex ^{(talk here)} 14:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gade, J. S.

A tag has been placed on Gade, J. S. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Q ^{T C} 08:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:How to edit a page. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Q ^{T C} 09:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Powerwave

Regardless of notability, I saw this and removed the inappropriate content that made it look like advertising. The firms web page and advertising are appropriate places to present the technical background, but we just link. I also removed the detailed list of offices, and company officers and directors. Ditto--we just give the CEO.

However, it reads very much like it was copied from some other source. If it was, it will need to be entirely rewritten. . DGG ( talk ) 17:01, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]