User talk:Parable1991

Image tagging for Image:Michel Fugain.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Michel Fugain.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

If you need to move a page, but cannot because something already exists, please get an administrator to move the page for you or list it on WP:RM. I've just moved Football (soccer) and its talk page to Association football so that the page histories are with the right pages. _JD^talk 00:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And as an administrator, I have just moved those pages back to their agreed names which have been established over many years of Wikipedia's existence. Moving pages without agreement causes a huge amount of disputation, not to take into consideration the fact that renaming "Football (soccer)" would require well over 10,000 other articles to be edited to avoid potential double-redirects which will damage the functioning of Wikipedia as a whole. Please do NOT attempt to rename this article again without obtaining widespread agreement first. -- Arwel (talk) 00:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know

On 1 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Riley (motorcar), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howch e ng {chat} 19:09, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not add unreferenced negative biographical information concerning living persons to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Jeffree Star. Thank you. Part Deux 02:59, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated edits to Automobile

Your edits to the automobile page have been reverted twice. The term motor car has a space between the words. Please do not edit it to remove this space again. --Athol Mullen 01:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jackass

I saw no discussion of your move of this redirect. Undiscussed moves to popular pages and redirects causes navigational problems and can be considered vandalism. Please carefully consider any such move in future. Deizio talk 12:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

War of the Worlds

Your edits have made rather a mess of things and it might be wise not to do anymore work on the various entries until we have fixed it. Discussion is here (Emperor 19:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Sputnik program

Please do not move articles written in American English to titles in British English without a very good cause. Doing so is very disruptive and creates a mess for other editors to clean up. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 11:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slither (2006 film

You moved the movie Slither from Slither (film) to Slither (2006 film). This is probably a good thing, but you did it without taking care of the many, many links that lead it it. Please try to be more careful - and if you can, go clean up the mess you made by changing the links that lead to Slither (film) referring to the 2006 film. Thanks . Sensorium 19:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article moves

Please take care when moving articles. I have reverted your move of Richard III (play). See my explanation on the article talk page if you are uncertain of the conventions. Deb 22:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespearian Titles

Please be aware that the title given in the first printed edition of a given Shakespearian play is not used as its generally-accepted or authoritative title. Firstly, the idea that the title page of an early-C17th printed work provides the work's title as it was generally used, as modern books do, is an anachronism: instead, the title-page gives information about the work to potential purchasers, and does not necessarily entail that -- then or now -- the title which it provides is the correct one. (See Gulliver's Travels for a later example.) Indeed, for many works it is incorrect to think that any single title exists: many works entered an oral culture (ie theatre) before they were published, and different names might be used between editions: the best approach is to use the generally received title, then write a section on alternative titles if you feel like it.

Secondly, the practice of putting a period after the title was a grammatical practice, in the same way that one might write 'I hate Macbeth.': one can see this usage in many other works, such as Love-Letters Between a Noble-Man and his Sister (1684) or in The Dunciad, none of which include the period.

If you look within printed works, you will see that the titles that you have been creating are not used. The contents page of the First Folio, for example, uses titles much closer to modern, general usage.

Burn the asylum 09:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Meter (disambiguation)

Please do not make disambiguation pages into redirects. Their purpose is to provide links to several pages which have the same name, to avoid confusion. Seraphimblade 02:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that it is a cut and paste move. Page moves must be done using the move tab--see Help:Moving a page. Otherwise, the page history is dissociated from its page. —Centrx→talk • 03:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, too, the pages should be left where they are , because "meter" is a peculiar naming conflict. —Centrx→talk • 03:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your move of Mrs. Dalloway

Hello; please see the discussion at Talk:Mrs. Dalloway prior to moving the page again. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mika

Hi, please don't move articles before consulting the talk page, like you did at Mika (singer). There was a discussion on the subject, and it was determined that there was no consensus to move the page. Now it'll have to be moved back. ConDem^Talk 00:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Could you please make sure your pagemoves do not produce double-redirects. Thank you. Agathoclea 17:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dumbshit

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Dumbshit to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Mbc³⁶² 23:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Orson_Welles.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Orson_Welles.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your page moves

I can see you have been warned about this many times. Please do not move pages against consensus. According to Wikipedia's Manual of Style, pages use whatever national variety of English they were started with, which means that flatulence humor should not be moved to the British spelling of humour. If you move a page again against consensus of policy I will block you for disruption. Natalie 03:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

War of the Worlds again!

Please do not move pages without first consulting the article's talk page. I moved H.G. Wells' The War of the Worlds (2005 film) and H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds (2005 film) back to their previous places because the disambiguation of various War of the Worlds article titles was discussed in good detail on The War of the Worlds (disambiguation) talk page with the two aforementioned films where it was agreed that adding the year is an appropriate qualifier. It took a lot of work and ultimately an adminstrator to correct your previous moves, so please take others into consideration. If you feel differently on the naming issues, bring it up on the disambiguation or film article talk pages; otherwise, any ignorance of explaining your actions will be reverted. --Bacteria 12:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Lg86383-12.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lg86383-12.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:07, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Another page move

Dude, a little bit of warning would've been nice before you moved Justice League of America (film), especially as you haven't fixed the links to it. I can see from your talk page this is a common practice with. Ryan4314 02:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wicker Man page move

I approve of this move, but you should not have done a cut-and-paste. See Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves to fix it. —Ashley Y 05:41, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please do not move any pages by cutting and pasting the contents as this splits the page history which is required to maintain attribution under the terms of the licence the site uses (the GFDL). In future, please use the 'move page' function as this automatically moves the page history along with the text of the page. If the page already exists at the destination, please list the move at Wikipedia:Requested moves where an administrator will help with the move. If you have performed any other cut and paste moves, no matter how old, that have not yet been fixed, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen so an administrator can fix them. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, matt br 12:47, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of The War After the War to End All Wars

I have nominated The War After the War to End All Wars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Floaterfluss ^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to pass comment at Talk:Football in the Republic of Ireland#Requested move

Hello, I am leaving a friendly notice to invite you to participate at a requested move from 'Football in the Republic of Ireland' to 'Association football in the Republic of Ireland', due to your participation in a previous requested move. Hope to see you there! EJF (talk) 21:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 presidential election

I noticed you have edited 2008 presidential election. There is a small revert war on right now, and I would appreciate your comments on the Talk page. Thanks. --Kmsiever (talk) 20:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Claus edits

So tell, me why you should not be blocked for this edit? I can see you've been here for a while and appear to know the difference between editing and vandalism, so it begs the question as to why you'd offer such a bone-headed "edit." I welcome your response. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 18:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to care what I think, but as you behavior - if it continues - gives me or anyone else the ability to report your vandal behavior and have you blocked, your time would be better spent not acting surprised and offended. Perhaps it would be better spent not vandalising pages. Okey-doke sunshine? - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 16:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I just noted that you made the same edit again. Well, you cannot say you were not warned. Have fun. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 16:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you for 24 hours for this. You have been here long enough to know better. When you come back, please don't make vandalism edits or you will be blocked again. VegaDark (talk) 16:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your post on my talk page

You wrote:

I don't care because you do not have the power to exercise authority so I don't have to answer to you. Do you really think that you will make a difference in what I edit. I'm sorry to burst your bubble, moonshine but you've been drinking too much. Parable1991 (talk) 07:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, sure. Tell, me, how long were you blocked for vandalism last time? Listen carefully: I don't care what you edit, so long as you do it within the scope of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Every single time you make a bone-headed series of edits like the ones that resulted in your block, I will be there to revert it and report you. Now, if you edit like a grown-up, you and I will - joyfully - never interact, and you can get back to your Driver's Ed and popping zits in the mirror. I think we're done here. There is no further need for you to write back to me, unless it is a tearful apology. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 07:51, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

A thread has been started regarding your behavior and your likely sockpuppetry here. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 16:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Manchurian Candidate (disambiguation)

The article The Manchurian Candidate (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary and not a true disambiguation, as all uses of this title are related and linked to and discussed within the respective articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. postdlf (talk) 19:53, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'nam listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 'nam. Since you had some involvement with the 'nam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 04:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Other left listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other left. Since you had some involvement with the Other left redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trashy magazine listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trashy magazine. Since you had some involvement with the Trashy magazine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Anome (talk) 14:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trashy magazines listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trashy magazines. Since you had some involvement with the Trashy magazines redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Anome (talk) 14:48, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quail hunting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quail hunting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quail hunting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ninney (talk) 22:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fishies

The article Fishies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 22:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

George Welles listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect George Welles. Since you had some involvement with the George Welles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 23:07, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is Harry on the Boat\ listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Is Harry on the Boat\. Since you had some involvement with the Is Harry on the Boat\ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

General Purpose listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect General Purpose. Since you had some involvement with the General Purpose redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Anmccaff (talk) 04:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frankie D listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Frankie D. Since you had some involvement with the Frankie D redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:54, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Free Encyclopaedia listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Free Encyclopaedia. Since you had some involvement with the The Free Encyclopaedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Investoa (talk) 14:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Maralind" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Maralind. Since you had some involvement with the Maralind redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Cary grant" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cary grant. Since you had some involvement with the Cary grant redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ask Why" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ask Why. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 3#Ask Why until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 15:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ask Why?" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ask Why?. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 3#Ask Why? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 15:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"A Voyage to the Moon" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect A Voyage to the Moon. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 28#A Voyage to the Moon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 04:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The Metropolis" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Metropolis. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 28#The Metropolis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 122.60.46.122 (talk) 09:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"'nam" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 'nam. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 9#'nam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 14:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"'hood" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 'hood and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 30#'hood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 22:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"'Hood" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 'Hood and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 30#'Hood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 22:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Louis van Beethoven" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Louis van Beethoven has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 12 § Louis van Beethoven until a consensus is reached. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Luigi van Beethoven" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Luigi van Beethoven has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 12 § Luigi van Beethoven until a consensus is reached. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 02:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kapish

The article Kapish has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Columbia Centre

The article Columbia Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

cannot find any notability, seems to be just an office building.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]