User talk:Paperclip8
June 2018
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on English people. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Take it to the talk page. It also appears that you are using multiple accounts to make this edit. Meters (talk) 16:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Are you also Harry Charles?
[edit]As you restored his edit. I can check. Doug Weller talk 17:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- No, I'm not, you can check, as you just said, if you don't believe me Paperclip8 (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why ask if you can check? --Paperclip8 (talk) 17:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Because it's polite. Is it really just a coincidence that you repeated his edit? Doug Weller talk 18:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I have to agree. It's very suspicious when a new WP:SPA is created, immediately restores the undone edit with a nearly identical summary, and then edit wars over it. The reappearance of the original account to make the edit again once you had been given an edit warring warning is also suspicious. Meters (talk) 21:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I’m actually not him, you said you could check, so why don’t you? Paperclip8 (talk) 21:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- You gave me the edit warning so I took it to the talk page, I haven’t a clue who Harry Charles is, I just agreed with his edit being a good idea Paperclip8 (talk) 21:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- And this edit to Tory?[1] Is that your edit? You aren't in touch with the editor using Harry Charles in any way? Doug Weller talk 10:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- You gave me the edit warning so I took it to the talk page, I haven’t a clue who Harry Charles is, I just agreed with his edit being a good idea Paperclip8 (talk) 21:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I’m actually not him, you said you could check, so why don’t you? Paperclip8 (talk) 21:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why ask if you can check? --Paperclip8 (talk) 17:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Paperclip8, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Paperclip8! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 22 June 2018 (UTC) |
August 2018
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui 雲水 10:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC) |