User talk:Paperarchitect5

Welcome...

Hello, Paperarchitect5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

I have also replied to your post at the New Contributers' Help Page.

Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 15:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help Me

Hello,

The editing resulted in a new page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mor_ve_Ötesi) without automatically replacing the older version (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mor_ve_Otesi).

The older version was a redirection. So was a second redirection then necessary for the new edit? What to do?

Really confused!

Paperarchitect5 (talk) 06:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The first thing is not to worry! You have done everything correctly as far as I can see. A redirect is a page that when clicked on, will take you to another page. A redirect page does not contain the article text, just a little bit of coding to send people on their way ;) You need do nothing to the redirect page when making an edit. Hopefully this has helped, if not, please replace the helpme template, or contact me on my talk page. Happy Editing, Tiddly-Tom 10:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you Elipongo and Tiddly Tom.

The fact is my editing has created double pages for the same topic.

Is this not a problem?

Will two pages exist, nearly identical save for a few differences, in Wikipedia?

Doesn't this challenge the query made for the topic?

How will this ever reach resolve?

Currently the page Mor ve Otesi just sends users to Mor ve Ötesi. there is only one article, just another page with a link to it. This is fine - we can have two pages, and causes no problems :-). I hope this helps Pump me up 08:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}

Thanks Pumpmeup. The edit took place. Then days later, somehow, the page reverted to its pre-edit version. The word in the first sentence should read "violet." This is the edit. However, the article currently reverts to the pre-edit word "purple." This is a common error in usage committed by new bilingual speakers. What is the next step? Paperarchitect5 (talk) 07:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. An IP reverted your change this morning [1]. If I were you, I would leave a polite message on the talk page of the article explaining why it is wrong. If no one replies, try changing it again in around a week. Hope this helps. Tiddly-Tom 07:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Hi

Thank you for your kind message. You are welcome, and if you have any more problems - please feel free to contact me through my talk page. Tiddly-Tom 10:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hi

Hey. I have looked through the page history and can not see too much action. If there were to be over three reverts in, the three revert rule may have been breached. A citation would help as less confusion would be caused. Thanks. Tiddly-Tom 15:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]