User talk:Paolo.marraffa

the block is unfair

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paolo Marraffa (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Chris troutman were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Mere mentions and sources not independent of the subject don't count. You clearly made no effort to read WP:N.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paolo Marraffa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paolo Marraffa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 14:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paolo.marraffa! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 14:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paolo.marraffa, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Chris Troutman (talk) 16:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eleonora is my girl friend Paolo.marraffa (talk) 20:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Paolo Marraffa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Paolo Marraffa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because I don’t promote the Apostolic Movement but I talk about my creation on Wikipedia. Pope Francis, Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI met the Apostolic Movement, welcomed and approved it. This entity doesn't need my promotion. I don't even promote myself, but I want to improve my web reputation and i want to enrich wikipedia Eleonoracacia98 (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are making a mistake Paolo.marraffa (talk) 20:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Paolo Marraffa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Paolo Marraffa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:17, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you won't delete the page because it can be improved Paolo.marraffa (talk) 21:28, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autobiography

Howdy hello! I see you've made one of the big mistakes that many first time users make: trying to create a page about yourself. Unfortunately Wikipedia doesn't work like that. Wikipedia is not for boosting your web visibility (i.e. advertising yourself, which is why your draft is up for deletion). If you are truly notable, meaning that reliable sources such as newspapers have given significant coverage of your life, someone will create an article about you in time. But I'm afraid that you're a regular person, like myself. I don't have a Wikipedia page, and neither do most people. If you're interested in Wikipedia, I encourage you to stick around and edit things you're interested in. But I'm afraid there is no way you're going to get a page about yourself published. I see that you're interested in Catholicism, you should drop a note at the WikiProject asking where a good place to get started editing is. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, now I must pray against Covid-19. Good night Paolo.marraffa (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🌴^{Talk🌲Help out at CCI!} 22:51, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paolo.marraffa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

False accusations: Spam / advertising + seemingly using other account to avoid repercussions. The administrator Moneytrees has been unfair and superficial to block paolo.marraffa for spam and advertising or the use of multiple users. I therefore ask for immediate unblockPaolo.marraffa (talk) 06:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Clearly you are either a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet- which isn't much of a difference anyway. We must treat you as a single person as we have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer/holding the phone making edits. You were both editing about the same subject. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:10, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ok now i’m going to contact the arbitration committee.