User talk:Pantress

September 2023

Hi Pantress! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank for your the info Muboshgu. This was my first Wiki edit, and I did feel it was minor, but will review your links to make sure I label the edit correctly next time. Do I need to go back, (if even possible) and remark it as major edit? Pantress (talk) 19:47, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

I was just reading over your 'minor edit page' and see that I made a 'huge error' in marking it as such. My sincere apologies, it won’t happen again.  I also see that my changes were reverted back to 'original reference' which is not accurate according to my detailed research.

I'm not sure how to change this, or fix this?  Do I need to follow up with the dummy edit I read up on? Will that repair the issue for administrative review and approval?

Also I saw a note that said the links I shared : "Sourced information removed and info added with sources that aren't considered to be WP:RELIABLE or independent)".

I don't know how that can be. Piers Morgan is a very famous TV personality; my website does independent research and blogging on a multitude of topics; and Wisner Baum is a well known, and respectable Law Firm that has won multiple lawsuits for vaccine injuries. All reputable, all independent.

I would like to contest the claims of the original author of this article and ask him to produce just one verifiable claim where Mr. Kennedy says ‘in his own words, or videos,’ that he is anti-vaxx. The wiki author had six citations of 'other' people's articles where the only ones who used that term anti-vaxx were those authors, not Mr. Kennedy.

I just spent the last 6 months heavily documenting research on this candidate, and I could not locate one statement anywhere that the candidate says this. Not one…. and I went back to the 1980's and scoured hundreds of articles, books, and videos.

I do agree that ‘millions of others’ have added this inaccurate 'anti-vaxx' label to him... though ‘them’ saying this, and ‘them’ repeating it, and ‘them’ reporting it, and ‘them’ spreading it… doesn't make it true. It just makes it an amplified falsity of misinformation.

I know WIKI has always prided themselves on facts and accuracy, and that is why I reference your site often and made a decision to alter the article.     

The only references I have ever found was of Mr. Kennedy ‘saying repeatedly’ that ‘he never said he was anti-vaxx’, and that all he ever wanted was ‘safe vaccines.’

That would make him a safe-vaccine activist, not an anti-vaxx activist.

Here are just a handful of quotes:

“I’ve never been anti-vaccine, and I’ve said that hundreds and hundreds of times but it doesn’t matter” - RFK Jr

“Saying I'm anti-vaccine is 'way of silencing me”  – Robert F Kennedy Jr.

“That’s not true… What I have said is vaccines, I’m not anti-vaccine. I think vaccines should be subjected to the same level of rigorous testing as other medications. And that is my only position.  I fought to get mercury out of fish for 40 years, and nobody called me anti-fish. I’m not anti vaccines just because I want safe vaccines. I think everybody wants safe vaccines.” https://www.youtube.com/live/JugZA6k9BnA?feature=share&t=2408

“They passed the vaccine act in 1986. And the vaccine act gave immunity from liability to all vaccine companies, if you, for any injury, for negligence. No matter how negligent you are, no matter how reckless your conduct, no matter how toxic the ingredient, how shoddily tested or manufactured the product, no matter how grievous your injury, you’re a vaccine company, you cannot be sued. This was a huge gift for this industry cause the biggest cost for every medical product is downstream liabilities. And all of a sudden, those disappeared. So you’re not only taking a way that cost, and incentivizing many new vaccines, your also dis-incentivizing, you’re removing the incentive to make them safe. No matter how dangerous they are, they don’t care, because they can’t be sued.”….  EAU vaccines “exempt from pre-licensing safety. They don’t have to be tested, and they’re not!” –  RFK Jr (2023) https://open.spotify.com/episode/3DQfcTY4viyXsIXQ89NXvg

“I am fearlessly Pro vaccine, I wanna see, I’ve had all six of my children vaccinated, I wanna see everybody taking their vaccines, we need full coverage. People don’t take them because they no longer believe in the CDC, cause they can see the science! We spent three years looking at every peer reviewed science publication ever written on Thimerosal. We found over 500 peer reviewed publications, all of them say it is the most potent neurotoxin that is not radioactive, why… its 30 times more toxic than lead. Why would we put that in children’s, a child, or pregnant woman if we didn’t have too. And we’ve already been shown by its removal from the pediatric vaccines, that we have good alternatives, we don’t need it anymore.” RFK JR (2014)

“CHD's mission is to end the childhood health epidemics by working aggressively to eliminate harmful exposures, hold those responsible accountable, and establish safeguards so these issues never happen again.” – CHD /RFK Jr.

Muboshgu, Can you recommend how to go about challenging the claims being made on multiple pages that reference Mr. Kennedy in such a negative, untruthful, and harmful light prior to the most important presidential election of our lifetime?

They can bring their facts, and I will bring mine? Isn’t that how it should be, let’s get to the truth of the matter, this has gone on way too long?  Facts over Fiction!

Thank you in advance for your response, Pantress Pantress (talk) 21:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)