User talk:Pankej Khanna

Welcome!

Hello, Pankej Khanna, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Protection types, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Music1201 (talk) 07:59, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Protection types

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Protection types, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Music1201 (talk) 07:59, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the article and protected it from re-creation. The main, or "article" namespace only serves for encyclopedic articles, not for Wikipedia procedures. (See WP:NAMESPACE.) I see that I have moved the page to User:Pankej Khanna/Protection types, but you blanked it. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:49, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pankej Khanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock this user directly:

This user did not make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia;
Instead made useful contributions. Pankej Khanna (talk) 06:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for the abuse of multiple accounts, so you will need to address that in any unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pankej Khanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason given for this users block is: Abusing multiple accounts. This user will make useful contributions instead if unblocked. This user was block with surprise. Pankej Khanna (talk) 08:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes, we know what the reason is! What we now need is an explanation from you as to what happened, why, and what you will do differently if unblocked. Also, if you are not sufficiently fluent in English to understand what is being asked of you, that might also prevent your being unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pankej Khanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This user understands what wrong thing was done, and will not do it again. This user was Abusing multiple accounts and understands that its wrong and will not do it again. Pankej Khanna (talk) 15:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please explain exactly what wrong thing was done, and why it was done.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to *explain* what wrong thing was done and *explain why* the wrong thing will not be done again - just *saying* you understand will not provide an admin with the confidence that you really do understand. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that you just saw fit to sock once more using the account Pedeish (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), I don't really think it would be safe to unblock you. Favonian (talk) 11:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pankej Khanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This user did that thing because he wanted to edit Wikipedia. Pankej Khanna (talk) 12:01, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have revoked your ability to make further appeals per the reasoning above and your failure to follow instructions. MER-C 12:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.