User talk:Pankajupadhyay05
Speedy deletion nomination of Mockint
[edit]A tag has been placed on Mockint requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 11:41, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- I have deleted the article because it contained absolutely no references to reliable, third-party sources to indicate why the website is significant, and its only vague claim to notability was that it had over 50 registered users (that's not very much). Also, because you created the article for a client, you are in a conflict of interest. Please do not do this again. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 19:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- I already told you what kind of content would be necessary for this article, in my comment above. Wikipedia has a notability guideline, meaning that you can only create an article like this if you can demonstrate that this website has been the subject of significant coverage in independent, third-party sources. Wikipedia's guideline for organizations and Wikipedia's guideline for web content has more information. For a random example of what an article like this should look like, see Network Solutions#References. I deleted your article because it has no references. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 21:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- I have deleted the article because it contained absolutely no references to reliable, third-party sources to indicate why the website is significant, and its only vague claim to notability was that it had over 50 registered users (that's not very much). Also, because you created the article for a client, you are in a conflict of interest. Please do not do this again. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 19:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Aartibajaj.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Aartibajaj.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 13:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
I dont know how to edit the image file page. Therefore, you can delete this file as i am uploading a new image with copyright and source information. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. --Pankajupadhyay05 (talk) 07:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC)