User talk:Panickroom

COAP

Fine, I agree with SPB. What is your reason for the "vandalism" crap? Secret of success 13:43, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Lynch 7 20:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for failing to understand why you were blocked the last time and for continuing your battleground mentality. I will restore your edits if the concerned users have no problems and there's general consensus (your good edits will remain, don't fret about that). If you wish to be unblocked, please use the {{unblock}} template and please don't bombard my inbox with mails; I will not respond. Lynch 7 20:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ocimum Bio Solutions

The article Ocimum Bio Solutions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Properly-named "Ocmium Biosolutions" was deleted 00:42, 2 March 2011. This article with different spelling apparently built to circumvent this. However I'm not sure this company does *not* deserve an article, this trick aside, but if so it should be under proper spelling, and move can't be made because of previous deletion. (I guess then this suggests a revisiting of 2007-2011 deletion.)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Doprendek (talk) 04:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]