User talk:Pandy223

July 2020

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that in this edit to Decade, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yoshi24517 ^Chat _{Very Busy} 03:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Decade, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Yoshi24517 ^Chat _{Very Busy} 03:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its wrong Pandy223 (talk) 03:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decade is from 1-10 not 0-9 Pandy223 (talk) 03:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Decade. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 03:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The text indicates that the 0-9 decade is common usage as contrasted with 1-0, not that is "correct". You cannot change this due to your personal preference. It is indisputable, whether correct or not, that many people use this and that is all the text says. The year 2000 was not the start of the next millennium either but it was in such common usage that it was celebrated as such. Donner60 (talk) 03:44, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What did i do wrong? What you are saying is incorrect Pandy223 (talk) 03:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I gave my reasons read it before you talk about accusation Pandy223 (talk) 03:51, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What i said is correct you are give misinformation Pandy223 (talk) 03:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha Pandy223 (talk) 04:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decades should follow "0-9" format

Please see this discussion regarding whether decades should follow the "0-9" or "1-0" pattern. The general consensus was that Wikipedia goes by what is covered by the majority of reliable sources. The fact is, most reliable sources consider the "0-9" format as standard. Any other changes that have not reached a consensus is seen as disruptive editing and will get you blocked if you persist. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:50, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Youre wrong you cant count Pandy223 (talk) 03:53, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decades should follow 1-10 Pandy223 (talk) 03:55, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have done my research and have provided valid reasons Pandy223 (talk) 03:59, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 2020s. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 04:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Come at me bro i can create several accounts i wont stop you havent even done in text referencing you're telling me about research? Pandy223 (talk) 04:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pandy223, give it up. Whether you think you are right or not you are edit warring and if you do it again on either article you'll be blocked. Take it to the talk page and discuss and how about citing some sources while you're at it. Glen 04:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (2020s and Decade) for a period of 24 hours for 24 hours. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Glen 04:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now take it to the talk page. Glen 04:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha Pandy223 (talk) 04:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Glen Pandy223 (talk) 04:26, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Corvus has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Corvus was changed by Pandy223 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89679 on 2020-09-03T13:13:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck u they r not dangerous Pandy223 (talk) 12:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They should not be hunted down! Pandy223 (talk) 12:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are not dangerous these are false rumours Pandy223 (talk) 17:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]