User talk:Pandu108

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Pandu108, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Avi (talk) 06:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham

May I suggest you look at some of the core principles of wikipedia, including those relating to original research. There are long-standing and well-founded reasons why wikipedia does not allow unsourced speculation in articles. Thank you for your interest, and I hope you become a valued contributor. -- Avi (talk) 06:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not bias, but the application of one of wikipedia's core principles of the prohibition against original research. Please review that, and the other, polices that are required to be followed in order to participate in the wikipedia project. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the section above I provided some introductions to the project. I would suggest you take a few days to read the major points, paying special attention to the Wikipedia:Five pillars and each of the listed (bluelinked) guidelines and policies. As an aside, the teachings of any one guru would likely fail wikipedia's requirements for verifiability and reliability. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 14:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In a nutshell, adding information without verifiable and reliable sources is a violation of wikipedia's prohibition against original research. Verifiability, not truth is the wikipedia mantra. Please review the information I directed you to earlier. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 17:05, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]